Computers have become closely involved with most aspects of modern life and these developments are tracked in the chemical sciences. Recent years have seen the integration of computing across chemical research, made possible by investment in equipment, software development, improved networking between researchers and rapid growth in the application of predictive approaches to chemistry, but also a change of attitude rooted in the successes of computational chemistry -it is now entirely possible to complete research projects where computation and synthesis are cooperative, integrated, and work in synergy to achieve better insights and so improved results. It remains our ambition to put computational prediction before experiment, and we have been working towards developing the key ingredients and workflows to achieve this.The ability to precisely tune selectivity along with high catalyst activity make organometallic catalysts using transition metal (TM) centres ideal for high value-added transformations, and this can make them appealing for industrial applications. However, mechanistic variations of TM-catalysed reactions across the vast chemical space of different catalysts and substrates are not fully explored, nor is such an exploration feasible with current resources. This can lead to complete synthetic failures when new substrates are used, but more commonly we see outcomes that require further optimisation, such as incomplete conversion, insufficient selectivity, or the appearance of unwanted side products. These processes consume time and resources, but the insights and data generated are usually not tied to a broader predictive workflow where experiments test hypotheses quantitatively, reducing their impact.These failures suggest at least a partial deviation of the reaction pathway from that hypothesised, hinting at quite complex mechanistic manifolds for organometallic catalysts which are affected by the combination of input variables. Mechanistic deviation is most likely when challenging, multifunctional substrates are being used, and the quest for so-called privileged catalysts is quickly replaced by a need to screen catalysts libraries until a new "best" match between catalyst and substrate can be identified and reaction conditions optimised. As a community we remain confined to broad interpretations of the substrate scope of new catalysts and focus on small changes based on idealised catalytic cycles, rather than working towards a "big data" view of organometallic homogeneous catalysis, with routine use of predictive models and transparent data sharing.Databases of DFT-calculated steric and electronic descriptors can be built for such catalysts, and we summarise here how these can be used in the mapping, interpretation, and prediction of catalyst properties and reactivities. Our motivation is to make these databases useful as tools for synthetic chemists, so they challenge and validate quantitative computational approaches. In this account we demonstrate their application to different aspects of cataly...