Setting positive end-expiratory pressure in the severely obstructive patient

Abstract

Purpose of review The response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation depends on the underlying pathophysiology. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of COPD, especially intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) and its consequences, and the benefits of applying external PEEP during assisted ventilation when PEEPi is present. Recent findings The presence of expiratory airflow limitation and increased airway resistance promotes the development of dynamic hyperinflation in patients with COPD during acute respiratory failure. Dynamic hyperinflation and the associated development of PEEPi increases work of breathing and contributes to ineffective triggering of the ventilator. In the presence of airflow limitation, application of external PEEP during patient-triggered ventilation has been shown to reduce inspiratory effort, facilitate ventilatory triggering and enhance patient-ventilator interaction. To minimize the risk of hyperinflation, it is advisable to limit the level of external PEEP during assisted ventilation after optimization of ventilator settings to about 70% of the level of PEEPi (measured during passive ventilation). Summary In patients with COPD and dynamic hyperinflation receiving assisted mechanical ventilation, the application of low levels of external PEEP can minimize work of breathing, facilitate ventilator triggering and improve patient-ventilator interaction.

Impact of tracheostomy tube modalities on ventilatory mechanics: a bench study

“…The only exception was noted in the obstructive lung model, with an increase in WOB occurring with cuff deflation. One explanation could be that the decrease in expiratory resistance while the cuff is inflated in such circumstance might be beneficial for patients with obstructive diseases [ 16 , 17 ]. However, it is important to note that our model does not replicate vocal cords and their physiological impact on patient respiratory mechanics.…”