Setting Priorities For Comparative Effectiveness Research: From Assessing Public Health Benefits To Being Open With The Public

Dubois, Robert W.; Graff, Jennifer

doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0136

Cited by 24 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stakeholder pressure/interest plays a role in most decision making processes, a state of affairs that needs to be acknowledged to increase transparency and minimize, as much as possible, the risk and appearance of bias (26). Stakeholder pressure/interest plays a role in most decision making processes, a state of affairs that needs to be acknowledged to increase transparency and minimize, as much as possible, the risk and appearance of bias (26).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Which Criteria Are Considered in Healthcare Decisions? Insights From an International Survey of Policy and Clinical Decision Makers

Tanios

Wagner²,

Tony

et al. 2013

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Which Criteria Are Considered in Healthcare Decisions? Insights From an International Survey of Policy and Clinical Decision Makers

Tanios

Wagner²,

Tony

et al. 2013

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, other industry representatives (e.g., device manufacturers) were not participants, and future efforts may benefit from including a wider cross-section of industry representatives. The optimal size and breadth of stakeholder organizations for research prioritization activities needs further study (19).…”

Section: Lessons Learned and Recommendations For Cer In Copdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Krishnan

Lindenauer

et al. 2013

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is intended to address the expressed needs of patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders. Representatives of 54 stakeholder groups with an interest in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participated in workshops convened by the COPD Outcomes-based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation (CONCERT) over a 2-year period. Year 1 focused on chronic care and care coordination. Year 2 focused on acute care and transitions in care between healthcare settings. Discussions and provisional voting were conducted via teleconferences and e-mail exchanges before the workshop. Final prioritization votes occurred after in-person discussions at the workshop. We used a modified Delphi approach to facilitate discussions and consensus building. To more easily quantify preferences and to evaluate the internal consistency of rankings, the Analytic Hierarchy Process was incorporated in Year 2. Results of preworkshop and final workshop voting often differed, suggesting that prioritization efforts relying solely on requests for topics from stakeholder groups without in-person discussion may provide different research priorities. Research priorities varied across stakeholder groups, but generally focused on studies to evaluate different approaches to healthcare delivery (e.g., spirometry for diagnosis and treatment, integrated healthcare strategies during transitions in care) rather than head-to-head comparisons of medications. This research agenda may help to inform groups intending to respond to CER funding opportunities in COPD. The methodologies used, detailed in the online supplement, may also help to inform prioritization efforts for CER in other health conditions.

show abstract

“…Integrated health care delivery organizations are well situated to identify important research questions whose answers could improve the everyday delivery of health care. 3 These settings include large groups of nonresearch and research clinicians who care for patients in a population-based model of care, health system administrators who manage the health care systems in which these patients are seen, and the members or patients themselves. Given the breadth of questions that comparative effectiveness research can address, identifying and prioritizing questions with the greatest clinical significance is essential and should include the perspective of practicing leaders and clinicians.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Effectiveness Topics from a Large, Integrated Delivery System

Danforth

Patnode

Kapka

et al. 2013

TPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Setting Priorities For Comparative Effectiveness Research: From Assessing Public Health Benefits To Being Open With The Public

Cited by 24 publications

References 12 publications

Which Criteria Are Considered in Healthcare Decisions? Insights From an International Survey of Policy and Clinical Decision Makers

Which Criteria Are Considered in Healthcare Decisions? Insights From an International Survey of Policy and Clinical Decision Makers

Stakeholder Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Comparative Effectiveness Topics from a Large, Integrated Delivery System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About