1984
DOI: 10.1016/0748-5751(84)90004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting realistic expectations for publishing in leading accounting research journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have focused on the contributors themselves seeking to evaluate both individual productivity (Howard and Nikolai, 1983; Heck, Cooley and Hubbard, 1986; Heck and Bremser, 1986; and Heck, Jensen and Cooley, 1990), and institutional productivity (Klemkosy and Tuttle, 1973; Andrews and McKensie, 1978; Windal, 1981; Dyl and Lilly, 1985; Heck and Bremser, 1986; Heck, Cooley and Hubbard, 1986; Niemi, 1987; Heck, Jensen and Cooley, 1991; Zivney and Bertin, 1992; Hasselback and Reinstein, 1995; Borokhovich, Bricker, Brunarski and Simkins, 1995; and Zivney, Bertin and Gavin, 1995). Still more studies have focused upon other aspects of publication and productivity, such as quality of doctoral programs (Bazley and Nikoloi, 1975); factors contributing to published research (Cargile and Bublitz, 1986); measures of research productivity (Bublitz and Kee, 1984); time‐delay in doctoral productivity (Jacobs, Hartgraves and Beard, 1986); bibliometric distributions (Chung and Cox, 1990); promotion (Schroeder and Saftner, 1989); realistic research expectations (Rouse and Stockley, 1984); origin of research, data and journal (Lukka and Kasanen, 1996); and finance professors’ research standards (Fishe, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have focused on the contributors themselves seeking to evaluate both individual productivity (Howard and Nikolai, 1983; Heck, Cooley and Hubbard, 1986; Heck and Bremser, 1986; and Heck, Jensen and Cooley, 1990), and institutional productivity (Klemkosy and Tuttle, 1973; Andrews and McKensie, 1978; Windal, 1981; Dyl and Lilly, 1985; Heck and Bremser, 1986; Heck, Cooley and Hubbard, 1986; Niemi, 1987; Heck, Jensen and Cooley, 1991; Zivney and Bertin, 1992; Hasselback and Reinstein, 1995; Borokhovich, Bricker, Brunarski and Simkins, 1995; and Zivney, Bertin and Gavin, 1995). Still more studies have focused upon other aspects of publication and productivity, such as quality of doctoral programs (Bazley and Nikoloi, 1975); factors contributing to published research (Cargile and Bublitz, 1986); measures of research productivity (Bublitz and Kee, 1984); time‐delay in doctoral productivity (Jacobs, Hartgraves and Beard, 1986); bibliometric distributions (Chung and Cox, 1990); promotion (Schroeder and Saftner, 1989); realistic research expectations (Rouse and Stockley, 1984); origin of research, data and journal (Lukka and Kasanen, 1996); and finance professors’ research standards (Fishe, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be useful to administrators in decisions regarding faculty promotion, tenure, and merit raises (Rouse and Shockley 1984). Regardless of how publications may be viewed by faculty and administrators, to accounting students, publications demonstrate the instructors' dedication to both the teaching and accounting professions.…”
Section: Educational Background and Relevant Experiencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Publications are seen as a means to evaluate and rank accounting scholars (Guthrie et al , 2012; Zamojcin and Bernardi, 2013). Discussions concerning the expectations regarding publishing have been ongoing for several decades (de Villier and Dumay, 2013; Rouse and Shockley, 1984). Notwithstanding the debates over journal rankings (Herron and Hall, 2004; Moore, 2015; Sangster, 2015), it is “imperative upon faculty in many countries, to publish in journals which do well in the specific ranking systems that their academic managers recognize” (Marriott et al , 2014, p. 270).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%