2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting research priorities to improve the health of children and young people with neurodisability: a British Academy of Childhood Disability-James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership

Abstract: ObjectivesTo engage young people, parent carers and clinicians in a systematic process to identify and prioritise research questions regarding ways to improve the health and well-being of children and young people with neurodisability.DesignBritish Academy of Childhood Disability (BACD)-James Lind Alliance research priority setting partnership bringing together patients, carers and clinicians as equal stakeholders.SettingUK health service and community.MethodsThe BACD Strategic Research Group formed the partne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Priority setting methods have been established and used by almost 30 JLA PSPs, including prostate cancer [19], vitiligo [20], palliative and end of life care [21], childhood neurodisability [22], and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa [23]. Details of the methods agreed and adopted can be found in a number of publications [24][25][26][27][28], and therefore only a brief summary is presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priority setting methods have been established and used by almost 30 JLA PSPs, including prostate cancer [19], vitiligo [20], palliative and end of life care [21], childhood neurodisability [22], and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa [23]. Details of the methods agreed and adopted can be found in a number of publications [24][25][26][27][28], and therefore only a brief summary is presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although eliciting the views of parents and carers as well as other professional groups would have strengthened our research priority setting exercise, and there are examples of such initiatives (Morris et al . ), our work reports on the results of engaging nurses only, with a view to developing this work further and engaging all stakeholders in future activities. A more inclusive approach at the outset, although considered at the time and rejected on the grounds of being practically more complex to undertake and needing more resources, with the availability of other methodologies might be a consideration for other teams about to embark on a similar exercise.…”
Section: Reflections On and Limitations Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The childhood disability group asked the Health Technology Assessment and Health Services and Delivery Research programmes to identify which of their top questions were the focus of successful funding awards 4. A year after publication, two were being answered: the top priority regarding therapeutic regimens and the 10th focusing on sleep disturbance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%