Setting the global research agenda for community health systems: literature and consultative review

Abstract

BackgroundGlobally, there is renewed interest in and momentum for strengthening community health systems, as also emphasized by the recent Astana Declaration. Recent reviews have identified factors critical to successful community health worker (CHW) programs but pointed to significant evidence gaps. This review aims to propose a global research agenda to strengthen CHW programs.Methods and resultsWe conducted a search for extant systematic reviews on any intermediate factors affecting the effectiveness of CHW programs in February 2018. A total of 30 articles published after year 2000 were included. Data on research gaps were abstracted and summarized under headings based on predominant themes identified in the literature. Following this data gathering phase, two technical advisory groups comprised of experts in the field of community health—including policymakers, implementors, researchers, advocates and donors—were convened to discuss, validate, and prioritize the research gaps identified.Research gap areas that were identified in the literature and validated through expert consultation include selection and training of CHWs, community embeddedness, institutionalization of CHW programs (referrals, supervision, and supply chain), CHW needs including incentives and remuneration, governance and sustainability of CHW programs, performance and quality of care, and cost-effectiveness of CHW programs. Priority research questions included queries on effective policy, financing, governance, supervision and monitoring systems for CHWs and community health systems, implementation questions around the role of digital technologies, CHW preferences, and drivers of CHW motivation and retention over time.ConclusionsAs international interest and investment in CHW programs and community health systems continue to grow, it becomes critical not only to analyze the evidence that exists, but also to clearly define research questions and collect additional evidence to ensure that CHW programs are effective, efficient, equity promoting, and evidence based. Generally, the literature places a strong emphasis on the need for higher quality, more robust research.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0362-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A future for the world's children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission

“…143 However, evidence suggests a high attenuation of these positive effects when governments take proofofprinciple community health worker studies and implement them on a larger scale, and more research is needed on per formance and quality of care provided. 144 Two systematic reviews considered interven tions on how to improve the performance of community health workers. 145,146 Imple mentation factors, such as recruitment, supportive super vision, incentives, commu nity embeddedness (whereby community members have a sense of ownership of the programme and positive relationships with the com munity health workers), continuous education, and adequate logistical support and supplies are crucial for success.…”

The community health worker as service extender, cultural broker and social change agent: a critical interpretive synthesis of roles, intent and accountability

“…89 Other alternative approaches to supervision such as community supervision (community defines expectations, tracks performance and provides feedback), group supervision (supervisory visits include multiple CHWs, who can work together to find creative solutions to shared problems) and peer supervision are also being tested, 9 90 91 but these remain areas for further research, according to a recent literature and consultative review. 61 Medicine and equipment shortages among CHWs or at facilities and poor quality of care in facilities limit…”

Using mHealth to improve health care delivery in India: A qualitative examination of the perspectives of community health workers and beneficiaries

“…As CHWs are selected from the local community to serve their own community and act as a link between the formal health system and the community, the extent of embeddedness in the community can define the level of CHW acceptance and investment. The embeddedness can also influence the level of the CHW engagement, including building of trust and empathetic relationships between the CHW and community members [24][25][26]. In communities with a functional CHW-community interface, the CHWs are recognized and share high levels of trust and stronger relationships with community members, CHWs are well positioned to conduct home visits and counsel beneficiaries on behavior change topics, enabling them to deliver program objectives.…”