2014
DOI: 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting the Stage for Successful Oral Feeding

Abstract: To evaluate the impact of implementing the Supporting Oral Feeding in Fragile Infants (SOFFI) program in a tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on the oral feeding, growth, and length of stay outcomes of a heterogeneous population of medically fragile infants at discharge and feeding and growth outcomes postdischarge at 3 to 5 months postterm. Data related to feeding, growth, and length of stay from a convenience sample of 81 infants recruited pre-SOFFI training were compared with data for 75 inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also increasing evidence indicating that oral feeding readiness should be assessed on the basis of acquired developmental and behavioural feeding cues rather than feeding volume and duration 32 . Horner et al 33 examined the efficacy of an intervention directed to support feeding development in medically complex preterm infants. The authors reported a significant reduction in the number of days needed to attain exclusive oral feeding in the infants who were enrolled in the intervention program compared with infants who had received standard care (10.8 vs 19.3 days, p = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also increasing evidence indicating that oral feeding readiness should be assessed on the basis of acquired developmental and behavioural feeding cues rather than feeding volume and duration 32 . Horner et al 33 examined the efficacy of an intervention directed to support feeding development in medically complex preterm infants. The authors reported a significant reduction in the number of days needed to attain exclusive oral feeding in the infants who were enrolled in the intervention program compared with infants who had received standard care (10.8 vs 19.3 days, p = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While weight gain is an important indicator of infant well-being, outcomes of evidencebased oral feeding initiatives have shown that infants orally fed based on readiness and feeding quality gained weight at least on par with or faster than those whose oral feedings followed a specific schedule. 11,12,41 Our finding of less reliance on weight gain as a criterion to reduce the number of oral feeding attempts in the postimplementation group indicates a change in culture and practice that reflects a Cat nap refers to short break before reattempting oral feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similar to other NICU's feeding practices,6,9,31 prior to initiating the IDF protocol we relied on weight gain/loss to make decisions about oral feeding frequency. While weight gain is an important indicator of infant well-being, outcomes of evidence-based oral feeding initiatives have shown that infants orally fed based on readiness and feeding quality gained weight at least on par with or faster than those whose oral feedings followed a specific schedule 11,12,41. Our finding of less reliance on weight gain as a criterion to reduce the number of oral feeding attempts in the postimplementation group indicates a change in culture and practice that reflects a broader understanding of factors to consider when making oral feeding decisions after IDF education and implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeding methods have also been developed in which the caregiver is guided by the responses of the preterm infant. Methods such as the Supporting Oral Feeding in Fragile Infants (SOFFI) [18][19][20] or the Infant-Driven Feeding Scales IDFS 21 are applied as decision-making algorithms and include both behavioral responses and caregiver interventions in their assessments. The impact of implementing these methods has also recently been evaluated 22,23 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%