1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315400052541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settlement ofBalanus Balanoides: The Effect of Cyprid Antennular Secretion

Abstract: In a recent paper we reported on the discovery of an adhesive antennular secretion used by exploring cyprids of Balanus balanoides (L.) and hinted at its possible implication in settlement behaviour (Walker & Yule, 1984). This secretion is thought to be modified integumentary protein. Since the integumentary protein of adult B. balanoides is widely accepted as a powerful stimulus to settlement (Knight-Jones, 1953; Crisp & Meadows, 1962, 1963; Larman, Gabbott & East, 1982), we devised settlement exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The localization of this cue to cuticle means that one mode of detection could be through contact of the cyprid (presumably with the paired antennules) with the cuticle that covers the basal region of the shell plates of the adult barnacle (Bourget 1977). Moreover, we have shown previously that the attachment disc of the cyprid antennules immunostains for the SIPC and that this glycoprotein is deposited on the substratum during the cyprid 'exploratory' walk prior to final settlement (Matsumura et al 1998b;Dreanno et al 2006); these 'footprints' then act as a cue to other cyprids promoting additional settlement (Yule & Walker 1985;Clare et al 1994). The localization of the SIPC in the barnacle cuticle suggests that in addition to functioning as a contact pheromone, this glycoprotein might also act as a waterborne cue (an attractant?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The localization of this cue to cuticle means that one mode of detection could be through contact of the cyprid (presumably with the paired antennules) with the cuticle that covers the basal region of the shell plates of the adult barnacle (Bourget 1977). Moreover, we have shown previously that the attachment disc of the cyprid antennules immunostains for the SIPC and that this glycoprotein is deposited on the substratum during the cyprid 'exploratory' walk prior to final settlement (Matsumura et al 1998b;Dreanno et al 2006); these 'footprints' then act as a cue to other cyprids promoting additional settlement (Yule & Walker 1985;Clare et al 1994). The localization of the SIPC in the barnacle cuticle suggests that in addition to functioning as a contact pheromone, this glycoprotein might also act as a waterborne cue (an attractant?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Inhibit~on of cyprid attachment has also been reported for natural multi-species microfilms on polystyrene petri dishes preconditioned in seawater ( M a h et al 1988, 1990, 1992), but those observations are confined to relatively young films, with substrata being preconditioned for only 24 to 120 h. The use of varying, and often large, numbers of larvae in their assays (15 to 200 per dish, Maki et al 1988Maki et al , 1990Maki et al , 1992 renders their data difficult to interpret in view of possible density-related behavioural effects. Yule & Walker (1985) and Clare et al (1994) have raised the possibility of cyprid-cyprid interactions at the time of settlement having important implications for the design of barnacle settlement assays, and the latter recommend utilization of low cyprid densities or even single larvae wherever possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, contact with live adults may 15 not be the only way a conspecific cue could influence barnacle settlement in the wild. Cyprids 16 leave conspecific cues on surfaces when adhesive proteins are secreted from their antennules 17 during exploration of the substrate (Yule and Walker, 1985;Clare et al, 1994). Fine-scale 18 observations on distribution of cyprids suggest that they aggregate (Wethey, 1984), which could 19 be a response to secretions from the antennules or another source of conspecific cues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%