A Companion to American Literary Studies 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444343809.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settler States of Feeling: National Belonging and the Erasure of Native American Presence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leifso's analysis shows that Rider Nation is an exclusively white settler identity: "citizenship in Rider Nation remains dependent upon settler feelings and an acceptance that difficult times, defined solely by the experience of white settler Saskatchewanians, are a thing of the past" (Leifso 2019:53). Thus, Rider Nation works to reproduce settler colonial and national projects by ignoring or marginalizing forms of despair that occur (particularly to Indigenous peoples) in the present (Rifkin 2011;Mackey 2014;Leifso 2019). As Leifso writes, "in the Rider Nation, all is well.…”
Section: Headlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leifso's analysis shows that Rider Nation is an exclusively white settler identity: "citizenship in Rider Nation remains dependent upon settler feelings and an acceptance that difficult times, defined solely by the experience of white settler Saskatchewanians, are a thing of the past" (Leifso 2019:53). Thus, Rider Nation works to reproduce settler colonial and national projects by ignoring or marginalizing forms of despair that occur (particularly to Indigenous peoples) in the present (Rifkin 2011;Mackey 2014;Leifso 2019). As Leifso writes, "in the Rider Nation, all is well.…”
Section: Headlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Settler colonial ideology extends sovereignty to immigrants perceived by the dominant group as ethnically or culturally similar, while marginalizing immigrants regarded as culturally and ethnically distinct from the dominant group. If, as Mark Rifkin suggests, indigenous people, deprived of their sovereign claims to land, have suffered from the “forced incorporation” into the settler colonial state, then immigrants seeking inclusion are met with resistance (342). Since many immigrants come to settler‐colonial societies such as the United States and Canada as refugees or in otherwise precarious circumstances, their immigration is not an extension of colonial sovereignty.…”
Section: Little Mosque On the Prairiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As unmarked, it has often been invisible to white scholars and persons (Moreton‐Robinson ). Its invisibility relative to Indigenous difference is sustained in part by what Mark Rifkin has called a “settler common sense” that comprises an “embodied set & of sensations, dispositions, and lived trajectories” that shape action in the “field of possibility” constituted by settler society (Rifkin , 8–9, 12–16; see also Rifkin ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%