1990
DOI: 10.1021/es00074a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settling and coagulation characteristics of fluorescent particles determined by flow cytometry and fluorometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is expected because the pigment particles used in these experiments are known to be very stable with respect to self-coagulation. Although a range of particle sizes can cause apparent second-order loss from the water column [Newman et aL, 1990a], deviations from first order are not evident in these data since the pigment particles were presettl ed to narrow the size distribution and remove the large, fast-settlin g particles(> 0.1 m day-1 ) and because pure settling produces less than 20% loss from the water column over the course of the experiment. The difference in removal rate between column D and the columns with a fluidized interfacial layer (A and E) must be attributed to an interfacial process, as the water column conditions were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is expected because the pigment particles used in these experiments are known to be very stable with respect to self-coagulation. Although a range of particle sizes can cause apparent second-order loss from the water column [Newman et aL, 1990a], deviations from first order are not evident in these data since the pigment particles were presettl ed to narrow the size distribution and remove the large, fast-settlin g particles(> 0.1 m day-1 ) and because pure settling produces less than 20% loss from the water column over the course of the experiment. The difference in removal rate between column D and the columns with a fluidized interfacial layer (A and E) must be attributed to an interfacial process, as the water column conditions were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Scuba divers collecting cores in Salem Sound observed a mobile interfacial layer of the order of 1 cm deep being sheared by long-wave swells. Considering the relatively low collision efficiency of the tracer particles (o: = 5 X 104) [Newman et al, 1990a], we conclude that effective deposition velocities for natural fine particles with higher collision efficiencies (O! = 10-2 to 10-1) could be at least an order of magnitude higher, i.e., 1 to 10 m day-1 at this site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations