2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEV‐Net: Residual network embedded with attention mechanism for plant disease severity detection

Abstract: Summary Early and accurate assessment of plant disease severity is key to preventing disease attack. Traditional detection methods rely on manual vision to distinguish between types of disease infection, but this is time consuming, laborious and inaccurate. To address this problem, this paper proposes a deep learning‐based attentional network model (SEV‐Net) for plant disease severity identification and classification. The network embeds the improved channel and spatial attention module into the residual block… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model removes the nonlocal attention mechanism in AM-GAN, and other structures are the same as the AM-GAN. In addition, current mainstream, AM-FCN [ 43 ] embedded based on attention, Attention U-Net [ 44 ] fused on attention in both encoder and decoder, DANet [ 45 ] embedded based on dual attention, and SEVNet [ 46 ] fused on SE module are selected as comparison models. The four index values of accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score are used for comparative evaluation.…”
Section: The Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model removes the nonlocal attention mechanism in AM-GAN, and other structures are the same as the AM-GAN. In addition, current mainstream, AM-FCN [ 43 ] embedded based on attention, Attention U-Net [ 44 ] fused on attention in both encoder and decoder, DANet [ 45 ] embedded based on dual attention, and SEVNet [ 46 ] fused on SE module are selected as comparison models. The four index values of accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score are used for comparative evaluation.…”
Section: The Experiments and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we compared our method with nine state-of-the-art methods, Among these methods, traditional segmentation methods using CNNs were included, such as SegNet [12], Bayesian SegNet [13], AttentionUNet [16] , CE-Net [17], MM-LinkNet [14], DFN [15],and SEVnet [18]. Also include some segmentation methods using DPM, such as EnsemDiff [9] and MedsegDiff [10].…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain tumor segmentation, some common approaches involve using variants of U-Net to predict the segmentation masks for the input, such as [16,17,18]. Their common feature is the use of an encoder-decoder structure to extract features and then restore them to the original resolution.…”
Section: Brain Tumor Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section will provide an overview of the CBAM attention mechanism. Woo proposed CBAM, which would be comprised of two modules: the channel attention module and the space attention module ( Bao et al, 2021 ; Gao et al, 2021 ; Zhao Y. et al, 2021 ). The CBAM module is shown in Figure 9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%