2017
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seven-day genotypic resistance-guided triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy can be highly effective

Abstract: BackgroundThe efficacy and applicability of molecular testing to guide the selection of antibiotics in triple Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens have not been reported. We tested a 7-day, genotypic resistance-guided triple H. pylori eradication therapy in a high-resistance setting.MethodsConsecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection were prospectively enrolled. Genotypic resistances to clarithromycin (23SrRNA mutations) and fluoroquinolones (gyrA mutations) were determined from gast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following tailored triple therapy, the pooled eradication rate was 97.8%. There was no significant difference in eradication rates between treatment‐naive and treatment‐experienced groups . This, however, is at odds with a Spanish study which found significantly higher eradication rates (83% vs 33%) in culture‐guided therapy in treatment‐naïve patients …”
Section: Culture‐guided Treatmentcontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following tailored triple therapy, the pooled eradication rate was 97.8%. There was no significant difference in eradication rates between treatment‐naive and treatment‐experienced groups . This, however, is at odds with a Spanish study which found significantly higher eradication rates (83% vs 33%) in culture‐guided therapy in treatment‐naïve patients …”
Section: Culture‐guided Treatmentcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…There was no significant difference in eradication rates between treatment-naive and treatmentexperienced groups. 61 This, however, is at odds with a Spanish study which found significantly higher eradication rates (83% vs 33%) in culture-guided therapy in treatment-naïve patients. 10 An Italian study comparing sequential and bismuth-based therapy did not find that the pattern of bacterial resistance significantly affected eradication rates.…”
Section: Culture-g U Ided Tre Atmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, unlike other regimens, few studies have evaluated AST-based first-line regimens. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate for a first-line regimen is >90% [30][31][32]. In South Korea, a PCR-based first-line tailored therapy is superior to the standard triple therapy (STT; amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and PPI) [30,31].…”
Section: H Pylori Treatment Based On Ast Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Korea, a PCR-based first-line tailored therapy is superior to the standard triple therapy (STT; amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and PPI) [30,31]. In a Greek study, genotypic resistance-guided triple therapy (clarithromycin and levofloxacin susceptibility testing by GenoType HelicoDR assay) has achieved a high H. pylori eradication rate (90.2% by ITT and 97.8% by per-protocol (PP) analyses) [32]. In addition, AST-guided first-line triple regimens result in a >90% eradication rate in patients with H. pylori resistant to two antibiotics [33].…”
Section: H Pylori Treatment Based On Ast Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few available studies gathered data on the potential of a PCR-tailored approach and found promising results [172,173]. Interestingly, a Greek pilot study [174] determined remarkably high cure rates using a tailored 7-day triple regimen, in which selection of the key antibiotic (clarithromycin, levofloxacin, or rifabutin) relied on a PCR-based reverse hybridization assay. In the future, both clinical and economic evaluation data are awaited to better characterize the position of molecular testing in routine practice [175,176].…”
Section: Recommendation Grade: C; Evidence Level: 4; Agreement Level:mentioning
confidence: 99%