Seven-Year Approach Evolution of the Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Endovascular Treatment

Kasemi, Holta; Marino, Mario; Dionisi, Carlo Patrizio; Angelo, Costantino Luca Di; Fadda, Gian Franco

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.016

Cited by 29 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, we found a 83.3% primary patency rate in one year. Lun et al reported a 93.6% patency rate for the similar time period (19). However, our result does not have a significant difference from theirs (83.3% vs. 93.6%; P value = 0.409).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 57%

Endovascular Treatment Showing Promising Short-Term Results in Patients with Total Bilateral Aortoiliac Occlusion

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 57%

Endovascular Treatment Showing Promising Short-Term Results in Patients with Total Bilateral Aortoiliac Occlusion

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, in an analysis of 136 iliac endovascular procedures, Timaran et al 14 reported an operative mortality rate of 0.7% and a survival rate of 78% at 5 years. Similarly, in a study of the evolution of AIOD endovascular treatment approaches over a 7-year period, Kasemi et al 15 also reported a perioperative mortality rate of 4.5% among 22 patients with TASC D lesions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease

Soares

Matielo

Neto

et al. 2018

Journal of Vascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For extensive stenosis or occlusion of the aortoiliac artery (TASC grading, types C and D), a recent meta-analysis shows that EVT also has a technical success rate of 90% and a one-year primary patency rate of nearly 90% (14). Cases of EVT for IAO have been reported in the early 1990s (15,16), and more case series study has appeared in recent years (6,8,9,17,18). A cases series including 49 IAO patients treated with EVT reported the primary patency rate was 88.4% at 1 year and 80.1% at 3 years(6).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment versus bypass surgery for infrarenal aortic occlusion: a single-center experience

Wang

Shao

Qiu

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Infrarenal aortic occlusion (IAO) is a complete occlusion of infrarenal aorta, which is the most complicated and severe subclass of aortoiliac occlusive disease(AIOD). The first-line treatment for IAO is bypass surgery due to its favorable patency rate. As endovascular technique advances, several retrospective studies have reported their endovascular experience for IAO. However, whether endovascular treatment(EVT) is comparable to bypass surgery for IAO required further study. This research was to study the safety and efficacy of EVT for IAO compared to bypass surgery. Methods From 2003 to 2017, 44 consecutive patients with IAO was treated with EVT(n=16) or aortofemoral bypass surgery(n=28). The therapeutic strategy depended on patient’s will and state of health. Demographics, comorbidity, mortality, complication rate, and symptom-free survival proportion was compared by T-tests or chi-square test, to illustrate the safety and efficacy of EVT and bypass surgery. Results The demographics and pre-operative Rutherford classification equally distributed in the two groups(P>0.05). As for technical success, comorbidities, mortality, complication rate, and Rutherford classification after procedures, clinical success, no significant difference was observed(P>0.05). The median post-procedure hospital stay was 4 days in the EVT group and was significantly shorter than that of the bypass, which was 11 days(P<0.05). As for short-term and long-term results, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year the cumulative symptom-free survival rates were 85.7%, 85.7% and 85.7% in the EVT group, 100%, 94.1% and 80.7% in the aortofemoral bypass group. There was no significant difference in symptom-free survival rate between the two groups according to log-rank test (P=0.92) Conclusions The safety and efficacy of EVT were comparable to that of anatomic bypass surgery for IAO. EVT could be a feasible option for IAO.

show abstract

Seven-Year Approach Evolution of the Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Endovascular Treatment

Cited by 29 publications

References 21 publications

Endovascular Treatment Showing Promising Short-Term Results in Patients with Total Bilateral Aortoiliac Occlusion

Endovascular Treatment Showing Promising Short-Term Results in Patients with Total Bilateral Aortoiliac Occlusion

The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease

Comparing the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment versus bypass surgery for infrarenal aortic occlusion: a single-center experience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About