2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seven-year tolerability profile of glucocorticoids use in early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the ESPOIR cohort

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the 7-year tolerability profile of glucocorticoids (GC) for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsWe examined data for 602 patients with RA from the early arthritis Etude et Suivi des POlyarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes (ESPOIR) cohort (<6 months disease duration) stratified into two groups: with or without GC treatment at least once during follow-up (median 7 years (IQR 0.038–7.65)). The main outcome was a composite of death, cardiovascular disease (including myocardial ischaemia, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…9 However, new data concerning GC safety came from the recently published ESPOIR cohort study, where RA patients with low-dose GC treatment displayed, in a 7-year analysis, approximately the same safety profile as patients without GC. 10 As it was expected, patents on GC (n=368) had more aggressive disease compared to patents without GC (greater use of NSAIDs, csDMARDs and bDMARDs, more active disease and more disability), and showed numerically a higher number of total adverse events (n= 44 vs 21) and infections (n=16 vs 3), compared to patients without GC exposure; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.520 and p=0.09 respectively). In a further weighted Cox proportional-hazards analysis, composite outcomes do not differ with and without GC (p=0.520; HR=0.889; 95% CI 0.620 to 1.273).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…9 However, new data concerning GC safety came from the recently published ESPOIR cohort study, where RA patients with low-dose GC treatment displayed, in a 7-year analysis, approximately the same safety profile as patients without GC. 10 As it was expected, patents on GC (n=368) had more aggressive disease compared to patents without GC (greater use of NSAIDs, csDMARDs and bDMARDs, more active disease and more disability), and showed numerically a higher number of total adverse events (n= 44 vs 21) and infections (n=16 vs 3), compared to patients without GC exposure; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.520 and p=0.09 respectively). In a further weighted Cox proportional-hazards analysis, composite outcomes do not differ with and without GC (p=0.520; HR=0.889; 95% CI 0.620 to 1.273).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This assumption is backed by both the published EULAR Task Force work1 and the real-life data by Roubille et al 8…”
Section: The Updated View On Using Glucocorticoids In the Treatment Omentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, the data reported by Roubille et al 8 show that 64% of RA patients received low-dose prednisone for the entire follow-up. The mean duration of total GC treatment was 1057±876 days, which is much longer than the recommended maximum period of 6 months.…”
Section: The Updated View On Using Glucocorticoids In the Treatment Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the French ESPOIR cohort of patients with early arthritis, 45% started GCs during the first 6 months and more than 50% received GCs at least once over 5 years after inclusion 14. Overall, the dose of GCs received during follow-up was very low, the mean was 3.1±2.9 mg/day 15. In the Canadian CATCH cohort of patients with RA, 42% were considered GCs users and the median oral daily dose was 5 mg (IQR 2.5–10) 16…”
Section: Current Practicementioning
confidence: 99%