Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Ahlström, David

doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9315-7

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Artikel ilmiah seringkali lemah pada uraian permasalahan yang komprehensif dan menggambarkan urgensi penelitian sehingga potensi penolakan oleh editor jurnal menjadi semakin tinggi. Hasil kajian editorial jurnal ilmiah menunjukkan bahwa jurnal bereputasi seringkali mengharuskan penulis untuk menyusun permasalahan penelitian yang spesifik sehingga menggambarkan mengapa penelitian tersebut penting dilakukan (urgensi) (Ahlstrom, 2012) yang dikaitkan dengan implikasi penelitian (kontribusi penelitian) (Gopaldas, 2016;Griffiths & Norman, 2016). Permasalahan penelitian disajikan dalam bentuk tinjauan urgensi penelitian dalam perspektif bagaimana masalah serupa diselesaikan pada tempat berbeda.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Standar Isi Artikel Penelitian: Komponen Detail untuk Dipublikasikan di Jurnal Ilmiah

Asy’ari¹,

Bilad

Muhali³

2022

Empiric. Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peningkatan publikasi ilmiah Indonesia pada jurnal ilmiah mengalami peningkatan pesat. Pada tahun 2019-2020, Indonesia bahkan berada pada peringkat 1 di ASEAN. Sayangnya peningkatan jumlah publikasi tersebut tidak dibarengi dengan peningkatan jumlah sitasi sehingga menunjukkan minimnya kualitas tulisan ilmiah Indonesia. Permasalahan tersebut dapat disebabkan oleh kurangnya kemampuan dalam menulis karya tulis ilmiah. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan standar isi pada tiap komponen artikel ilmiah seperti abstrak, pendahuluan, metode, hasil dan pembahasan, dan kesimpulan/implikasi. Tiap komponen tersebut setidaknya berisi 200-250 kata yang terdiri dari 18 paragraf sehingga total jumlah kata pada satu artikel ilmiah adalah 3600-4500 kata. Detail isi pada setiap paragraph dijelaskan lebihlanjut pada artikel ini. Standard Content of Research Paper: Detail Component to Get Publish in Scientific Journal Abstract The increase of Indonesian scientific publications in scientific journals has increased rapidly. In 2019-2020, Indonesia is even ranked 1st in ASEAN. Unfortunately, the increase in the number of publications was not accompanied by an increase in the number of citations, thus indicating the low quality of Indonesian scientific writings. These problems can be caused by a lack of ability in writing scientific papers. This article aimed to describe the content standards for each component of scientific articles such as abstracts, introductions, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions/implications. The components of the scientific article must contain at least 200-250 words consisting of 18 paragraphs so that the total number of words in one scientific article is 3600-4500 words. Details of the contents of each paragraph are explained further in this article.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Standar Isi Artikel Penelitian: Komponen Detail untuk Dipublikasikan di Jurnal Ilmiah

Asy’ari¹,

Bilad

Muhali³

2022

Empiric. Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Drawing on a number of sources in management, and allied social sciences including economics and psychology (Cummings and Frost, 1995;Huang, 2007;Huff, 1999Huff, , 2008Kerlinger, 1995;Klein and Zedeck, 2004;Machi and McEvoy, 2008;Sutton and Staw, 1995;Zedeck, 2008) as well as our own experience as editors (Ahlstrom, 2011;Bruton, 2009) this paper provides a summary of the key items to which authors should pay particular attention in preparing empirical papers to enhance their publishability. This list, while not exhaustive, does provide some hints on what editors want and essential guidelines for prospective authors, while helping them avoid common problems (Ahlstrom, 2012b;Baruch et al, 2008;Huff, 1999Huff, , 2008Kilduff, 2007). Specifically, we address eight areas that we and other researchers have found that authors often have trouble with in turning their research into publishable papers.…”

Section: The Early Portions Of the Empirical Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Turning good research into good publications

Ahlström

Bruton

Zhao

2013

Nankai Business Review International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to provide a basic list of items that many standard empirical papers need and to highlight some common and fixable problems, as well as some corresponding suggestions and solutions such that authors can turn good research into good papers that have an improved chance of publication. Design/methodology/approach -This paper is a conceptual study on publishing, though it draws heavily on two of the authors' experience as editors of major management journals and their past work on paper organization and research design. A number of helpful resources for authors have also been provided from the academic literature -both journals and books -so that this paper can be a helpful resource to authors in organizing and preparing their work to submit to an appropriate journal. Findings -This paper's findings are listed as follows. First, prospective authors will gain a much clearer understanding of whether a journal is an appropriate outlet for their work by reading the journal's aims and scope. Second, a good Introduction is a crucial element of a paper and must contain key basic information such as the research question (or thesis statement), a mini-literature review that situates the paper in past work, a quick summary of results, and the paper's contributions. Third, in the Literature Review or Theory section, it is important to review the development of the more relevant literature in the chosen topic, the key empirical or case findings, and why the focal paper seeks to enter the field at this time. Fourth, in the Method section, authors should try to provide as much helpful descriptive data as space permits. Fifth, in the Results section, authors should present the results for each hypotheses one by one, but limit the discussion in that section to the results and some brief explanation. Additionally, the Discussion section should have four parts including the contributions, limitations of the research, future research, and any other unusual findings. Finally, many papers suffer from formatting problems or do not fit the aims and scope of the target journal. Authors should be careful to check on these issues before submission. Originality/value -This paper is complementary to works on methods and research design in that it helps authors with the important step of organizing their papers to turn good research into good manuscripts with a better chance of publication.

show abstract

“…Many reasons are identified why journal articles are rejected. They arise from different flaws in the research design, manuscript organization, results and discussion, conclusion (Ahlstrom, 2012;Akhtar, 2008;Fischer et al, 2017;Holschuh, 1998;Johnson, Putnam Davis, & Bandy, 2020;Pimm, 2013;Stivers & Cramer, 2017;Sullivan, 2015). Ezeala Nweke & Ezeala (2013) studied the common errors in the manuscript submitted to medical science journals in Asia and Africa showed that out of 42 papers analyzed, they found crucial flaws in every section of the document.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Technology-Based Tools in Ensuring Quality of Publishable Journal Articles

Magulod

Capulso²,

Tabiolo³

et al. 2020

IJLTER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific publication is a pillar that gauges the human intellectual capital of countries in the global innovation index. This paper presents the effectiveness of using technology-based tools in ensuring the quality of articles for journal publication. It employed a pre-and post-test research design to determine the effectiveness of online technology-based tools before and after the intervention. It employed a descriptive presentation of the different online technology tools used in the 21 specimens of faculty research written in publishable article formats. It examined the quality of references, level of readability, writing quality, originality, and grammar of the papers before and after the review process and interventions. The study highlighted that using the online tools improved the quality of the documents on grammar and lexical rate, similarity index, readability index, number of references, number of correct bibliographic entries for submission in high impact journals. A higher level of a cleansing process using online technology tools ensures the quality of publishable articles. Implications of this study will facilitate the academic community's journal article writing skill to effectively disseminate research studies results with higher chances of being accepted in respected global databases to contribute to knowledge generation and development of the country.

show abstract

Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Cited by 11 publications

References 43 publications

Standar Isi Artikel Penelitian: Komponen Detail untuk Dipublikasikan di Jurnal Ilmiah

Standar Isi Artikel Penelitian: Komponen Detail untuk Dipublikasikan di Jurnal Ilmiah

Turning good research into good publications

Use of Technology-Based Tools in Ensuring Quality of Publishable Journal Articles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About