Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 screening to augment dental office and patient safety

Feldman, Cecile A.; Fredericks-Younger, Janine; Subramanian, Gayathri; Gennaro, Maria Laura; Coker, Modupe; Fine, Daniel H.

doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2021.12.011

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When a virus with high morbidity and/or mortality is widely circulating within a community, testing is a key mitigation strategy that should be considered within dental practice to help prevent in-office transmission [ 33 – 35 ]. By identifying infected individuals and halting person-to-person contact through testing, both DCHWs and patients can have an increased perception of safety within the dental practice environment [ 33 , 34 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Fredericks-Younger,

Feldman,

Allareddy

et al. 2024

Pilot Feasibility Stud

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a substantial interruption of care, with patients and workers fearful to return to the dental office. As dental practice creates a highly aerosolized environment, the potential for spread of airborne illness is magnified. As a means to increase safety and mitigate risk, pre-visit testing for SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to minimize disease transmission in dental offices. The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility Study examined the logistics and impact of two different testing mechanisms (laboratory-based PCR viral testing and point-of-care antigen testing) in dental offices. Methods Dental healthcare workers (DHCWs) and patients in four dental offices within the National Dental Practice-based Research Network participated in this prospective study. In addition to electronic surveys, participants in two offices completed POC testing, while participants in two offices used lab-based PCR methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis was limited to descriptive measures, with median and interquartile ranges reported for Likert scale responses and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Results Of the total 72 enrolled, 28 DHCWs and 41 patients completed the protocol. Two patients (4.9%) tested positive prior to their visit, while 2 DHCWs (12.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the start of the study. DHCWs and patients shared similar degree of concern (69% and 63%, respectively) for contracting COVID-19 from patients, while patients feared contracting COVID-19 from DHCWs less (49%). Descriptive statistics calculations revealed that saliva, tongue epithelial cells, and nasal swabs were the most desirable specimen collection method; both testing (LAB and POC) protocols took similar amounts of total time to complete; and DHCWs and patients reported feeling more comfortable when both groups were tested. Conclusions While a larger-scale, network study is necessary for generalizability of results, this feasibility study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 testing can be effectively implemented into dental practice workflows and positively impact perception of safety for DHCWs and patients. As new virulent infectious diseases emerge, preparing dental personnel to employ an entire toolbox of risk mitigation strategies, including testing, may have the potential to decrease dental practice closure time, maintaining continuity of dental care services for patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Fredericks-Younger,

Feldman,

Allareddy

et al. 2024

Pilot Feasibility Stud

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) When a virus with high morbidity and/or mortality is widely circulating within a community, testing is a key mitigation strategy that should be considered within dental practice to help prevent in-o ce transmission. (33)(34)(35) By identifying infected individuals and halting person-to-person contact through testing, both DCHWs and patients can have an increased perception of safety within the dental practice environment. (33,34) The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility study (36) was designed to examine the feasibility for implementing two COVID-19 testing strategies [lab-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and point-of-care testing (POC)] in dental o ces.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): A feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Fredericks-Younger,

Feldman,

Allareddy

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for practitioners to enhance workflows to increase safety and mitigate risk. As dental practice creates a highly aerosolized environment, pre-visit testing for SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to be an effective mitigation strategy to minimize disease transmission in dental offices. The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility Study examined the potential, logistics, and impact related to laboratory-based PCR viral testing and point-of-care (POC) antigen testing. Methods Dental healthcare workers (DHCWs) and patients in four dental offices within the National Dental Practice-based Research Network participated in this prospective study. In addition to electronic surveys, participants in two offices completed POC testing, while participants in two offices used lab based PCR methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this feasibility study, analysis was limited to descriptive measures. Median and interquartile ranges were reported for Likert scale responses and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables Results Forty-one of forty-three consented patients and twenty-eight of twenty-nine DHCWs completed the protocol. Descriptive statistics calculations including median and interquartile ranges revealed (1) saliva, tongue epithelial cells and nasal swabs were the most desirable specimens for testing for groups (2) both LAB and POC protocols took similar amounts of total time to complete the full testing protocol and (3) DHCWs and patients reported feeling more comfortable when both groups were tested. Conclusions This feasibility study suggests that pre-visit SARS-CoV-2 testing can be effectively implemented into dental practice workflows and positively impact perception of safety for DHCWs and patients, though a larger scale, network study is necessary for generalizability of results. As new virulent infectious diseases continue to emerge, preparing dental personnel to employ an entire toolbox of risk mitigation strategies, including testing, may have the potential to decrease dental practice closure time, maintaining continuity of dental care services for patients. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742.

show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 screening to augment dental office and patient safety

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): A feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About