Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction. Endometrial cancer is the most prevailing gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with an incidence rising annually. For years, systematic lymphadenectomy had been the preferred method for staging purposes, but a less aggressive approach, with no negative impact on the oncologic outcomes, is the current trend in endometrial cancer management. In this review, we aim to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping as an eligible alternative to complete pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging process, as well as its influence on the adjuvant treatment options. Materials and method. We analyzed the leading international guidelines regarding sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer, published between 2018 and 2023, as well as several studies that met the inclusion criteria, from the PubMed database, to outline the recommended surgical techniques, the algorithm, the accuracy, and the advantages of the SLN sampling procedure compared to pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results. Most international guidelines conclude that SLN sampling is the desirable alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy. However, it is agreed that, in case of failed SLN mapping, the radical option consisting in complete pelvic lymphadenectomy is recommended. As far as high-risk patients are concerned, most of the reviewed studies and guidelines encourage the use of SLN mapping in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Our findings revealed high sensitivity and detection rates of SLN mapping, influenced especially by the type of tracer used, indocyanine green having the best outcomes. Conclusions. Considering the high sensitivity and the low morbidity rates of the procedure, SLN mapping is soon to become a gold standard practice for the surgical staging process of endometrial cancer in many gynecologic oncology centers. Thus, SLN mapping represents a viable alternative to complete pelvic lymphadenectomy, acknowledging the principles of minimally invasive surgery and personalized medicine, without compromising the oncologic outcomes.
Introduction. Endometrial cancer is the most prevailing gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with an incidence rising annually. For years, systematic lymphadenectomy had been the preferred method for staging purposes, but a less aggressive approach, with no negative impact on the oncologic outcomes, is the current trend in endometrial cancer management. In this review, we aim to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping as an eligible alternative to complete pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging process, as well as its influence on the adjuvant treatment options. Materials and method. We analyzed the leading international guidelines regarding sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer, published between 2018 and 2023, as well as several studies that met the inclusion criteria, from the PubMed database, to outline the recommended surgical techniques, the algorithm, the accuracy, and the advantages of the SLN sampling procedure compared to pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results. Most international guidelines conclude that SLN sampling is the desirable alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy. However, it is agreed that, in case of failed SLN mapping, the radical option consisting in complete pelvic lymphadenectomy is recommended. As far as high-risk patients are concerned, most of the reviewed studies and guidelines encourage the use of SLN mapping in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Our findings revealed high sensitivity and detection rates of SLN mapping, influenced especially by the type of tracer used, indocyanine green having the best outcomes. Conclusions. Considering the high sensitivity and the low morbidity rates of the procedure, SLN mapping is soon to become a gold standard practice for the surgical staging process of endometrial cancer in many gynecologic oncology centers. Thus, SLN mapping represents a viable alternative to complete pelvic lymphadenectomy, acknowledging the principles of minimally invasive surgery and personalized medicine, without compromising the oncologic outcomes.
Methemoglobinemia is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition in which hemoglobin is oxidized, impairing the oxygen-carrying capacity. While congenital forms exist, acquired methemoglobinemia can occur in perioperative settings, especially following exposure to oxidizing agents such as dyes used in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Patent Blue V, a synthetic aniline dye commonly used for SLNB, has been associated with rare but serious adverse effects, including methemoglobinemia. We report a case of acquired methemoglobinemia in a 68-year-old female undergoing bilateral modified radical mastectomy with SLNB for breast carcinoma. The patient experienced a sudden and progressive decline in oxygen saturation (SpO2) following administration of 6 ml of 2.5% Patent Blue V. Despite supplemental oxygen therapy, hypoxia persisted, prompting arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis, which confirmed methemoglobinemia (9.2%). Immediate treatment with methylene blue (1 mg/kg) resulted in rapid clinical improvement, with the methemoglobin levels normalizing within eight hours. This case highlights the importance of early recognition and treatment of acquired methemoglobinemia, particularly in a perioperative setting. Patent Blue V is associated with both hypersensitivity reactions and methemoglobinemia, and its interference with pulse oximetry readings can complicate intraoperative monitoring. Prompt administration of methylene blue remains the standard treatment, leading to favorable outcomes. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding the possibility of methemoglobinemia when using dyes such as Patent Blue V during surgical procedures. Diagnostic tools, such as ABG or co-oximetry, are essential for accurate diagnosis, and early treatment with methylene blue can prevent serious complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.