Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The incidence of increased mitral regurgitation after percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy has been reported to range from 11% to 44%; however, only 3-1 1% of patients experience a deterioration by 2 2 severity grades [l]. The majority are due to small changes (i.e., worsening by one severity grade only). Given the longstanding pulmonary hypertension commonly present in these patients, mitral regurgitation is often well tolerated acutely. Furthermore, unlike the situation with severe mitral stenosis, the availability of reasonable medical therapy for mitral regurgitation (e.g., afterload reduction and diuresis) makes longer-term tolerance of this lesion possible.The natural history of iatrogenic mitral regurgitation has been a source of concern in the interventional community. In a group with procedure-related mitral regurgitation, Roth et al.[2] reported an improvement of one severity grade in 53% of those who underwent catheterization a mean of 9 months after the commissurotomy. More recent data from Reyes et al. [3] suggest that although 13 patients out of 30 had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation 1 week after commissurotomy, only 5 of these patients had persistent moderate or severe disease at 3 years. In our own cohort of 2 14 percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy patients at Duke University Medical Center, we have had similar instances of patients who have improved one severity grade over 3 months to 3 years of follow-up, but we have not seen any cases as dramatic as the one reported by Kannan and Jeyamalar [4] in this issue of the Journal.Putative mechanisms of balloon-related regurgitation are varied [l-71. Trauma to the mitral leaflets can be inflicted by the guidewire used with the non-Inoue technique, especially if the wire is placed out the left ventricle to the aorta and the large left ventricular loop is lost. This tends to put direct pressure on the anterior mitral leaflet. Trauma from the balloon itself can come about either because the balloon is oversized relative to the receptacle annulus, because the balloon is malpositioned, or simply because the valve morphology is unfavorable.An overly large balloon can result in excessive commissural splitting, annular stretching, or even annular tearing. To avoid this possibility, we endeavor to size the mitral annulus in multiple echocardiographic views prior to the catheterization, and we temper these measurements with a height-based nomogram for balloon size. Multivariable analysis has suggested that the ratio of balloon dilation diameter to body size has predictive value for iatrogenic mitral regurgitation [2]. Furthermore, we begin with modest balloon inflations and cautiously increase balloon volume with each inflation, stopping when either an adequate result is seen or maximal inflation is achieved. We are also careful to note whether commissural fusion is asymmetric by observing the mitral morphology in the short axis view (i.e., the one used for planimetry). If there is no commissural fusion along the lateral aspects of the leaf...
The incidence of increased mitral regurgitation after percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy has been reported to range from 11% to 44%; however, only 3-1 1% of patients experience a deterioration by 2 2 severity grades [l]. The majority are due to small changes (i.e., worsening by one severity grade only). Given the longstanding pulmonary hypertension commonly present in these patients, mitral regurgitation is often well tolerated acutely. Furthermore, unlike the situation with severe mitral stenosis, the availability of reasonable medical therapy for mitral regurgitation (e.g., afterload reduction and diuresis) makes longer-term tolerance of this lesion possible.The natural history of iatrogenic mitral regurgitation has been a source of concern in the interventional community. In a group with procedure-related mitral regurgitation, Roth et al.[2] reported an improvement of one severity grade in 53% of those who underwent catheterization a mean of 9 months after the commissurotomy. More recent data from Reyes et al. [3] suggest that although 13 patients out of 30 had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation 1 week after commissurotomy, only 5 of these patients had persistent moderate or severe disease at 3 years. In our own cohort of 2 14 percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy patients at Duke University Medical Center, we have had similar instances of patients who have improved one severity grade over 3 months to 3 years of follow-up, but we have not seen any cases as dramatic as the one reported by Kannan and Jeyamalar [4] in this issue of the Journal.Putative mechanisms of balloon-related regurgitation are varied [l-71. Trauma to the mitral leaflets can be inflicted by the guidewire used with the non-Inoue technique, especially if the wire is placed out the left ventricle to the aorta and the large left ventricular loop is lost. This tends to put direct pressure on the anterior mitral leaflet. Trauma from the balloon itself can come about either because the balloon is oversized relative to the receptacle annulus, because the balloon is malpositioned, or simply because the valve morphology is unfavorable.An overly large balloon can result in excessive commissural splitting, annular stretching, or even annular tearing. To avoid this possibility, we endeavor to size the mitral annulus in multiple echocardiographic views prior to the catheterization, and we temper these measurements with a height-based nomogram for balloon size. Multivariable analysis has suggested that the ratio of balloon dilation diameter to body size has predictive value for iatrogenic mitral regurgitation [2]. Furthermore, we begin with modest balloon inflations and cautiously increase balloon volume with each inflation, stopping when either an adequate result is seen or maximal inflation is achieved. We are also careful to note whether commissural fusion is asymmetric by observing the mitral morphology in the short axis view (i.e., the one used for planimetry). If there is no commissural fusion along the lateral aspects of the leaf...
The interpretation of left atrial (LA) hemodynamics have become increasingly important since a variety of left atrial interventions in addition to balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV) are more commonly being performed in the catheterization laboratory.In contrast to coronary interventions, which are monitored by fluoroscopy, balloon mitral valvuloplasty is guided by hemodynamic, echocardioraphic, and angiographic input during the procedure. From minute to minute during a BMV procedure, the most critical variable to influence decision-making is the left atrial pressure and the left atrial pressure waveform.A pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) tracing is inadequate for a number of reasons. While a number of studies have shown a good correlation between PCWP and left atrial pressure (LAP) with or without pulmonary hypertension [1,2], there are substantial data suggesting otherwise. Generally, the PCWP overestimates the LAP and mean transmitral gradient and, as such, the severity of mitral stenosis [3]. The problem of overestimation of the LAP is greatest when there is severe pulmonary hypertension. Despite the appearance of a good PCWP wave form, the PCWP pressure may be a hybrid with the pulmonary artery pressure. Even more so, PCWP is not accurate to assess success of gradient reduction post-BMV [4]. A poor PCWP waveform may be due to improper catheter positioning (overwedging), damping due to a bubble, catheter or pressure line kinking, or inadequate flushing of the fluid path. Good flushing, checking for kinks in tubing, using a stiffer end-hole catheter, and ensuring wedge saturation Ͼ 95% all help to decrease the pitfalls during use of PCWP as a guide during the procedure if LAP cannot be utilized. Direct monitoring of the left atrial pressure by a transseptal puncture is essential for BMV, since the fidelity of the pulmonary wedge pressure is not adequate to reflect hemodynamic events in the left atrium or the relationship between left ventricular and left atrial mechanics. An exception exists among patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. When BMV is preformed in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis, monitoring of the transmitral gradient is performed using the PCWP as an approximation of the LAP, and the dilatation balloon catheter itself remains in place in the left ventricle, rather than using a transprosthetic valve pigtail to monitor left ventricular pressure. Normal left atrial pressure is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the disparity between pulmonary wedge pressure and directly recorded left atrial pressure in a patient with mitral regurgitation. The wedge pressure tracing shows a phase delay, with a delayed peak in the v-wave. In addition, there is significant blunting of the magnitude of the v-wave. The most common artifact in a wedge pressure tracing is a false elevation due to contamination of the waveform with pulmonary artery pressure. When the PCWP is used for measurement of mitral valve area, this artifact can result in considerable overestimation of the ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.