2022
DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2022.1211040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Musculoskeletal Injuries in Children during Play

Abstract: Introduction: Musculoskeletal injuries are common in children but rarely severe. Their treatment varies according to the type of injury observed. The aim was to describe the epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of severe musculoskeletal injuries in children during play. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted in the Orthopaedic-Traumatology Department and the Paediatric Surgery Unit of the University Hospital of Bouaké between January 2018 and December 2020. It concerned p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 90 children were included in this study, out of which 58 (64.4%) were males and the remaining 32 (35.6%) were females, presenting a male:female ratio of 1.8:1. The preponderance of male children as the most frequently injured sex has been the usually observed trend in the literature [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18 ]. The observed male:female ratio of 1.8:1 in this study is a bit lower than the ratio of 2.1:1 reported by Hussain et al [ 5 ] and Verma et al [ 17 ] but higher than the 1.6:1 and 1.5:1 ratio reported by Nesje et al [ 2 ] and Hedström et al [ 19 ], respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 90 children were included in this study, out of which 58 (64.4%) were males and the remaining 32 (35.6%) were females, presenting a male:female ratio of 1.8:1. The preponderance of male children as the most frequently injured sex has been the usually observed trend in the literature [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 17 , 18 ]. The observed male:female ratio of 1.8:1 in this study is a bit lower than the ratio of 2.1:1 reported by Hussain et al [ 5 ] and Verma et al [ 17 ] but higher than the 1.6:1 and 1.5:1 ratio reported by Nesje et al [ 2 ] and Hedström et al [ 19 ], respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%