2017
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Outbreak of Sorbitol‐Fermenting Escherichia coli O157 via Unpasteurized Milk and Farm Visits, Finland 2012

Abstract: Shiga toxin-producing, sorbitol-fermenting Escherichia coli O157 (SF O157) has emerged as a cause of severe human illness. Despite frequent human findings, its transmission routes and reservoirs remain largely unknown. Foodborne transmission and reservoir in cattle have been suspected, but with limited supporting evidence. This study describes the outbreak of SF O157 that occurred in Finland in 2012. The outbreak originated from a recreational farm selling unpasteurized milk, as revealed by epidemiologic and m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the Czech Republic, where the novel SF EHEC O157 strains account for 20% of all SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains isolated from patients with HUS (10), the distribution and frequencies of these strains in other geographic regions, as well as the epidemiology of these infections, are currently unknown. In the Czech Republic, a SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strain with these unique plasmid characteristics was isolated from a cow epidemiologically associated with an HUS case (3), suggesting that cattle can be a reservoir for these novel strains, as also demonstrated for the "classical" SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains belonging to the German clone (6,17,18). Notably, SF E. coli O157:H Ϫ (fliC H7 ) strains that share chromosomal (presence of cdtV-ABC and eae-␥) and plasmid (presence of sfpA and absence of EHEC-hlyA and etpD) characteristics with the novel SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains but lack stx 2a were isolated from patients with HUS (n ϭ 1) or diarrhea (n ϭ 2) in the Czech Republic (M. Marejková and M. Bielaszewska, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the Czech Republic, where the novel SF EHEC O157 strains account for 20% of all SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains isolated from patients with HUS (10), the distribution and frequencies of these strains in other geographic regions, as well as the epidemiology of these infections, are currently unknown. In the Czech Republic, a SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strain with these unique plasmid characteristics was isolated from a cow epidemiologically associated with an HUS case (3), suggesting that cattle can be a reservoir for these novel strains, as also demonstrated for the "classical" SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains belonging to the German clone (6,17,18). Notably, SF E. coli O157:H Ϫ (fliC H7 ) strains that share chromosomal (presence of cdtV-ABC and eae-␥) and plasmid (presence of sfpA and absence of EHEC-hlyA and etpD) characteristics with the novel SF EHEC O157:H Ϫ strains but lack stx 2a were isolated from patients with HUS (n ϭ 1) or diarrhea (n ϭ 2) in the Czech Republic (M. Marejková and M. Bielaszewska, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SF STEC O157:H - was first described in Germany in 1988 [2] and subsequently caused several outbreaks in Germany [3-5] and elsewhere in Europe [6,7]. SF STEC O157 is characterised by a high pathogenicity [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SF STEC O157 was isolated from minced beef products in an outbreak involving 18 HUS cases in France in 2011 [6]. In an outbreak associated with a recreational farm visit in Finland in 2012, unpasteurised milk was the most likely vehicle and isolates from patients’ stool samples, cattle and the farm environment were identical [7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR-positive STEC samples were cultured and the isolates from positive cultures were sent to THL for typing. The detection of the virulence genes stx 1, stx 2, eae , hly A, and saa by PCR was performed as described previously [18]. For determination of O-serogroup, the group antiserum test and the latex agglutination tests for the most common serogroups were used as first-line method before proceeding to conventional serotyping [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%