2020
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1840563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severity analysis of crashes on express lane facilities using support vector machine model trained by firefly algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the support vector machine algorithm, RBF kernel function is selected. This kernel function has the characteristics of wide convergence domain and can handle a variety of samples, which is widely used [21][22][23]. RBF kernel function only involves one parameter, so its performance is more stable and easy to apply.…”
Section: Journal Of Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the support vector machine algorithm, RBF kernel function is selected. This kernel function has the characteristics of wide convergence domain and can handle a variety of samples, which is widely used [21][22][23]. RBF kernel function only involves one parameter, so its performance is more stable and easy to apply.…”
Section: Journal Of Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) had all been widely and successfully used in predicting the possibility of injury-severity outcome [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Choosing a suitable method for the crash prediction is critical.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies adopted other machine learning models, namely Support Vector Machine 1,9,13,22 , k-nearest neighbor 19,23 , and Naïve Bayes 18,24 to analyze a wide range of crash factors such as vehicle characteristics (i.e., vehicle age, condition of vehicle, weight of the vehicle, group of light trucks and vans, occupants involved, the body type of the vehicle), road infrastructure (road function, lane width, shoulder type, accident location), environmental condition (i.e., sight distance, lighting condition, weather, crash time, month/season) and temporal characteristics (i.e., crash type, time of day, day of the week, annual average daily traffic, type of separator, roadway terrain, left shoulder width, and right shoulder width, number of vehicles). Delen et al 13 revealed that Support Vector Machine performs better in low or high injury clarification and prediction with 90.41% accuracy.…”
Section: Background Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our preliminary observation from these studies is that the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes approaches are frequently applied machine learning algorithms www.nature.com/scientificreports/ in road safety research for their regularization parameter. These algorithms are important in avoiding over-fitting, better performance with imbalanced data, and non-linearity for input and target variables 22 . Among several feature selection techniques, chi-square, two-way ANOVA, and regression analysis have also been considered for their less complexity, effectiveness, and cost-sensitive properties.…”
Section: Analytical Context Of Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%