2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severity of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ipsilateral Hemispheric Ischaemic Events: Results from the ACSRS Study

Abstract: Linearity between ECST per cent stenosis and risk makes this method for grading stenosis more amenable to risk prediction without any transformation not only in clinical practice but also when multivariable analysis is to be used. Identification of additional risk factors provides a new approach to risk stratification and should help refine the indications for carotid endarterectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
119
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
119
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, currently there is a discrepancy between these scientific studies and clinical practice; despite of many publications and discussions, plaque imaging techniques are not really the basics of clinical decision making or current guidelines and in the majority of cases decision towards revascularization are not based on plaque morphology but on the degree of stenosis [108][109][110]. Evaluation of the role of predictive effects of the previously described imaging parameters are needed and further studies are necessary to incorporate the potential of the advanced imaging techniques in the identification of the vulnerable plaque to selection of the therapeutical approach.…”
Section: Clinical Practice and Results From The Scientific Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, currently there is a discrepancy between these scientific studies and clinical practice; despite of many publications and discussions, plaque imaging techniques are not really the basics of clinical decision making or current guidelines and in the majority of cases decision towards revascularization are not based on plaque morphology but on the degree of stenosis [108][109][110]. Evaluation of the role of predictive effects of the previously described imaging parameters are needed and further studies are necessary to incorporate the potential of the advanced imaging techniques in the identification of the vulnerable plaque to selection of the therapeutical approach.…”
Section: Clinical Practice and Results From The Scientific Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,42 Concerning stent placement in these patients, one should consider other risk criteria and not only the stenosis degree. 43 …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 The present study also shows that diabetes and previous contralateral symptoms were independent risk factors for neurological events ipsilateral to an asymptomatic carotid stenosis, which confirms the results of previous studies. 4,24 Although advanced age and hypertension are well-recognized risk factors for stroke, in this study they were not independent risk factors for ischemic neurological events ipsilateral to a carotid stenosis. This lack of association has also been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%