1999
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.5.595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severn–Trent sand: a kinematic-hardening constitutive model: the q–p formulation

Abstract: A simple model is described which is able to represent the mechanical behaviour of granular soils over a wide range of void ratios and mean stresses (neglecting grain crushing). The model combines Mohr–Coulomb failure, critical states, dependence of strength and stiffness on the state parameter, a hyperbolic law for plastic stiffness degradation and a flow rule similar to that of Cam Clay. The model is formulated within the framework of kinematic hardening and bounding-surface plasticity. The model requires tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
125
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, many modifications of the basic Cam Clay models have been proposed (Gens & Potts, 1988) but all retain energy-based fundamentals. This is also true of many alternative constitutive models, e.g., NorSand (Jefferies, 1993;Jefferies & Shuttle, 2002), Severn-Trent sand (Gajo & Muir Wood, 1999) and the model of Manzari & Dafalias (1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since then, many modifications of the basic Cam Clay models have been proposed (Gens & Potts, 1988) but all retain energy-based fundamentals. This is also true of many alternative constitutive models, e.g., NorSand (Jefferies, 1993;Jefferies & Shuttle, 2002), Severn-Trent sand (Gajo & Muir Wood, 1999) and the model of Manzari & Dafalias (1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because of the discrepancy in fitting experimental tests, a material constant D is often introduced in dilatancy equations for sand, such as that proposed by Jefferies (1993), Gajo and Muir Wood (1999), Yin et al (2010a), and Yin and Chang (2012) …”
Section: Modification Of the Stress Dilatancy Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 4). This is also a rather typical feature of peak strength in non reinforced granular soils, which is dependent on state variables, and there are diŠerent elegant ways in literature to express such a dipendency (e.g., Bolton, 1986;Gajo and Muir Wood, 1999). To emphasize the in‰uence of the stress state, the shear strength of the reinforced soils (ROS an RBRS) shown in Figs.…”
Section: A Possible Interpretation Of the Effect Of Fibre Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%