“…140 retracted articles out of 180 (77.8%) are still available in full text on respective journal websites, and 15 of these still available articles (10.7%) present no evident watermark clearly indicating the presence of a retraction (Acharya & Mandal, ; Asgary & Eghbal, ; Cuoghi, Sella, & de Mendonça, ; Dionysopoulos, Koliniotou‐Koumpia, Helvatzoglou‐Antoniades, & Kotsanos, ; Ellakwa & El‐Sheikh, ; Gulsahi et al, ; Khattab, El‐Seify, Shaaban, Radojevic, & Jankovic, ; Kurtulmus & Cotert, ; Nayyar, Khan, Bafna, Ahmed, & Chaluvaiah, ; Ni, Lin, Liu, & Xiao, ; Palenik, ; Scotti, Cardelli, Baldissara, & Monaco, ; Sumanth et al, ; Wang et al, ). The abstracts of 157 out of 180 retracted publications (87.2%) are still available on Pubmed, but 8 of these (5.1%) present neither a footnote nor any clear indication of the presence of a retraction notice (Agrawal, Singh, Rashmikant, Singh, & Chand, ; Dumitrescu, Zetu, & Teslaru, ; Ehrlich et al, ; Kumar et al, ; Maté Sánchez de Val et al, ; Rabanal, Bral, & Goldstein, ; Wang et al, ).…”