2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0ew00753f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sewage treatment at 4 °C in anaerobic upflow reactors with and without a membrane – performance, function and microbial diversity

Abstract: In this study, we investigated the feasibility of anaerobic sewage treatment at extremely low temperatures (4 °C) using two reactor setups: Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) without and with (AnMBRUASB(UF)) a membrane.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Petropoulos et al [ 59 ] compared the performances of two UASB reactors operating in an extreme condition of low temperature (4 °C), with and without an ultrafiltration membrane. They pointed out two interesting aspects: (i) organic substance conversion into methane occurred also in this condition with an HRT equals to 3 days, and (ii) both systems produced comparable results proving that degradation efficiency was not affected by the coupling with an ultrafiltration membrane [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petropoulos et al [ 59 ] compared the performances of two UASB reactors operating in an extreme condition of low temperature (4 °C), with and without an ultrafiltration membrane. They pointed out two interesting aspects: (i) organic substance conversion into methane occurred also in this condition with an HRT equals to 3 days, and (ii) both systems produced comparable results proving that degradation efficiency was not affected by the coupling with an ultrafiltration membrane [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed was introduced into the reactors either as Sterile (treated with ultraviolet light to exclude mesophilic biomass of the feed) or Non-sterile. The psychrophilic biomass was acclimated to both the operating temperatures (4 and 15 • C) and feed types as described by Petropoulos et al (2017Petropoulos et al ( , 2019Petropoulos et al ( , 2021 through series of batch and continuous experiments which lasted for more than three years. In this study, we re-acclimated the reactors for two months (hydraulic retention time was 60 h) and sampled (from both the bulk liquid and biofilm formed on the membrane) on Day 65 when the reactors were working at the steady state at the above-mentioned operational conditions.…”
Section: Reactor Description and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of PCR primers, such as F515/R806 (Caporaso et al, 2011) target the methanogenic Archaea that dominate in anaerobic digesters while simultaneously targeting bacterial groups common in anaerobic digestion. However this primer set preferentially targets Archaea in phyla associated with methanogenesis while missing many other archaeal phyla (Petropoulos et al, 2021) that are detected by Archaea-specific primers such as 349F/806R (Bahram et al, 2019). Use of Archaea-specific primers have been reported to detect Bathyarchaeota and other Archaeal phylum in anaerobic digesters (Lam et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%