1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01952069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex allocation in animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sex ratio did not deviate significantly from 1:1, in accordance with optimal resource allocation in populations with random mating (Leigh et al 1985, Mari et al 2008. Nevertheless, skewed sex ratios have been reported for some octocorals (Brazeau & Lasker 1990), specifi- Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The sex ratio did not deviate significantly from 1:1, in accordance with optimal resource allocation in populations with random mating (Leigh et al 1985, Mari et al 2008. Nevertheless, skewed sex ratios have been reported for some octocorals (Brazeau & Lasker 1990), specifi- Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There is considerable clear evidence for intragenomic conflict over sex allocation (Hamilton, 1967;Werren and Beukeboom, 1998) -indeed, sex ratio distorting elements provide some of the clearest examples of 'selfish genes' that distort the sex ratio in order to maximize their own transmission, but to the determent of the fitness of the individual carrying them (eg, Werren et al, 1981). As Leigh (Leigh et al, 1985;Leigh, 1986) suggested, a chromosomal sex ratio distorting mechanism might be vulnerable to invasion by selfish genetic elements, in which case suppression of the mechanism by autosomal genes would be favoured. Part of the variation between species in the extent to which they adjust the sex ratio might simply represent stochastic variation in whether they had been subject to invasion by selfish genetic elements followed by autosomal suppression.…”
Section: Sex Determination Adaptation and Constraint In Sex Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in some areas the fit of data to theoretical predictions can be expected to be so close that sex ratio theory has been argued to have a predictive power almost comparable to that of the 'hard' sciences of chemistry and physics (Hamilton, 1996). This has allowed work on the sex ratio to (a) provide some of the best quantitative evidence for the relative importance of natural Heredity selection at the gene, individual, kin and population levels (Leigh et al, 1985;Beukeboom and Werren, 1992;Seger and Stubblefield, 1996;Chapuisat and Keller, 1999;West et al, 2000a), and (b) to address very general questions about the precision of adaptation and the limits on natural selection (Herre, 1987;West and Herre, 1998;Herre et al, 2001). In addition, reasoning has been reversed and observed sex ratios have been used to estimate parameters upon which the sex ratio is predicted to depend, but which can be difficult to measure directly (eg, the inbreeding rate in malaria parasites, which is a parameter of clinical importance (Read et al, 1992;West et al, 2000bWest et al, , 2001a, the factor limiting reproduction in parasitic wasps (West and Rivero, 2000), or the relatedness between competing male fig wasps (West et al, 2001b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory is very clear concerning the conditions under which a sex-changer can invade a population consisting of pure males and females: if the sex-changer produces and fertilises more eggs than a pure female produces or a pure male fertilises, then a mutant for sex-changing will spread in the population Leigh et al, 1976;Charnov, 1982;Leigh et al, 1985). This, however, is a trivial statement, only saying that when sex-changers are more fit than gonochores, they will replace the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%