2017
DOI: 10.1675/063.040.0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and Geographic Variation in Grey-Faced Petrel (Pterodroma gouldi) Morphometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chick wings and tarsi grow consistently across a season and provide a conservative measure of chick condition over an extended period of nourishment. In contrast, chick body masses fluctuate significantly based on time since last provisioning, and thus are a less reliable measure of long-term chick condition, until they grossly differ from growth curves [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chick wings and tarsi grow consistently across a season and provide a conservative measure of chick condition over an extended period of nourishment. In contrast, chick body masses fluctuate significantly based on time since last provisioning, and thus are a less reliable measure of long-term chick condition, until they grossly differ from growth curves [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around egg hatching and chick fledging, weekly visits were increased to twice a week to obtain more accurate estimates of these dates. We took five morphological measurements of chicks at each inspection: body mass (grams) using a 1000-g Pesola scale, maximum flattened chord wing length (mm) using a steel butt-stopped rule, and false tarsus length (mm), bill culmen length (mm) and bill depth at nostrils (mm) using a pair of calipers (see [25]), although bill measurements were not subsequently used in analysis. From 2011 to 2013, we also measured unmonitored chicks on Te Hāwere-a-Maki once only at the end of the breeding season as a control to determine whether our regular handling of chicks may have negatively affected their growth rates.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%