2008
DOI: 10.1080/13576500701809846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and hemisphere differences when mentally rotating meaningful and meaningless stimuli

Abstract: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the influence of stimulus type and sex on strategy use and hemispheric processing during the mental rotation task. Participants included 67 right-handed men and women who completed three mental rotation tasks, all presented bilaterally. Participants rotated human stick figures, alphanumeric stimuli, and a two-dimensional (2D) meaningless object. No hemispheric differences were observed when rotating human stick figures, suggesting that men and women may rely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a recent meta-analysis of studies combining behavioural measures of cognitive ability with neuroimaging techniques revealed that the predicted pattern of concurrent differences in hemispheric specialization and abilities between men and women is actually rarely obtained (Hirnstein et al, 2018). For example, for male compared to female participants, Hahn et al (2010) reported stronger hemispheric asymmetry but not superior mental rotation, while Rilea (2008) reported superior mental rotation but not stronger hemispheric asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent meta-analysis of studies combining behavioural measures of cognitive ability with neuroimaging techniques revealed that the predicted pattern of concurrent differences in hemispheric specialization and abilities between men and women is actually rarely obtained (Hirnstein et al, 2018). For example, for male compared to female participants, Hahn et al (2010) reported stronger hemispheric asymmetry but not superior mental rotation, while Rilea (2008) reported superior mental rotation but not stronger hemispheric asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of lateralization effects in visuospatial tasks, we selected only right-handed men. 25 All participants underwent a neuropsychological assessment examining various cognitive functions. Details of exclusion and inclusion criteria and the neuropsychological assessment are described in appendix e-1 on the Neurology Web site at www.neurology.org.…”
Section: Participants Eighteen Patients With Amnesticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishkin, Ungerleider & Macko, 1983) unterschieden: eines für die Objektwahrnehmung, ein anderes für die Wahrnehmung des Raumes. Milner und Goodale (1995, 2008, zit. nach Eysenk, 2011 und Goodale und Milner (2004) Bertenthal (1996) auch "how"-System bezeichnet.…”
Section: Modell Von Milner Und Goodaleunclassified