2017
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.005739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cause for Concern for Young Women and Those With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with the previous and current literature demonstrating inferior outcomes for females when compared to males postcardiac surgery and revascularization [7,8,10,14,41]. Second, in studies that performed risk adjustments or propensity matching, the differences between males and females were reduced or eliminated [14][15][16]18,19,22,24,25,30,32,33]. This suggests that the female sex is not necessarily an independent predictor of mortality postoperatively, but the increased preoperative comorbidities that females present with confer a larger impact on their outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in keeping with the previous and current literature demonstrating inferior outcomes for females when compared to males postcardiac surgery and revascularization [7,8,10,14,41]. Second, in studies that performed risk adjustments or propensity matching, the differences between males and females were reduced or eliminated [14][15][16]18,19,22,24,25,30,32,33]. This suggests that the female sex is not necessarily an independent predictor of mortality postoperatively, but the increased preoperative comorbidities that females present with confer a larger impact on their outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This has led to difficulty interpreting the results of the literature, as when preoperative comorbidities and intraoperative approach are not controlled confounding variables prevent accurate analysis of the data. The majority of the studies noted in this review, as well and numerous other publications in the literature, have demonstrated that inferior outcomes experienced by females diminish after adjusting for preoperative risk and controlling for surgical approach [14][15][16]18,19,22,24,25,30,32,33]. This process reduces the number of confounding variables and most studies have not determined that female sex is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a Danish report suggested that women may be more sensitive compared with men to the deleterious effects of smoking [ 6 ]. According to other studies [ 21 , 26 ], women are more susceptible to the effects of nicotine consumption, which causes vasoconstriction, compared with men. Although previous studies [ 20 , 27 ] have reported that less aggressive treatment of acute coronary syndrome may be a causative factor to poorer outcomes in women than in men, in this study, the proportions of primary PCI (92.5% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.508) and PCI within 24 h (78.0% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.354) were similar at baseline ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example nicotine, a key component of cigarette smoke induces vasospasm, a mechanism of STEMI known to be more common in females. (22,25) STEMI patients present later and receive less standardised treatment if they are female, resulting in greater mortality. (25) This discrepancy in outcomes is mirrored at all stages of risk prevention for CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22,25) STEMI patients present later and receive less standardised treatment if they are female, resulting in greater mortality. (25) This discrepancy in outcomes is mirrored at all stages of risk prevention for CHD. In a study of 172 physicians, the "attitude study", found that physicians perceived coronary artery disease in males as being more important than in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%