1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01088-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and species differences in mouse and rat forebrain commissures depend on the method of adjusting for brain size

Abstract: Sex differences in the forebrain commissures (corpus callosum, hippocampal commissure, and anterior commissure) were examined in B6D2F2 hybrid mice and Sprague-Dawley rats. Twenty-four male-female littermate pairs of mice were perfused at each of 21, 42 and 63 days of age and the midsagittal area of the commissures was measured from en bloc stained tissue. Twenty-two male-female littermate pairs of rats were examined at 110 days of age using the same methods. Male mice had larger bodies than females but no sex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 3, areas of all three commissures were strongly and linearly related to brain weight [2]. Because this study included such a wide range of strains, linear regression equations were based on the 368 mice that clearly had normal commissures, rather than using equations from a previous study done in Edmonton [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3, areas of all three commissures were strongly and linearly related to brain weight [2]. Because this study included such a wide range of strains, linear regression equations were based on the 368 mice that clearly had normal commissures, rather than using equations from a previous study done in Edmonton [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-month-old male and female mice were perfused as described previously , and the brains were dissected out, weighed, and split in the midsagittal plane. The gold chloride staining of myelinated axons was performed as described previously (Bishop and Wahlsten, 1999;Wahlsten et al, 2003). The sagittal cutting face of right hemispheres of all brains was photographed using a Leica DFC 320 camera mounted on a Leica MZ 12.5 stereomicroscope at the same magnification.…”
Section: Formalin Test a Single Cohort Of Mice [Slc12a6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the corpus callosum (CCL) and the surface area of the anterior commissure (AC) were quantified using ImageJ software (Abramoff et al, 2004) by tracing anterior commissure and the corpus callosum. Because the size of the corpus callosum correlates with brain weight, the length was adjusted to the brain weight average in that group using the linear equation YЈ ϭ Y Ϫ b (X Ϫ M ), where YЈ was the adjusted size, Y was the size, b was the slope, X was the brain weight, and M was the average brain weight (Bishop and Wahlsten, 1999). The splenium was defined as the posterior 20% of the total corpus callosum length, which was established as the boundary between axons from the visual and parietal cortices in rat (Kim et al, 1996;Kim and Juraska, 1997).…”
Section: Formalin Test a Single Cohort Of Mice [Slc12a6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brains were removed from the skull and allowed at least 1 further week in fixative, and then weighed. Each brain was bisected at the midsagittal plane and stained en bloc with gold chloride for myelin [4,28], and then commissure areas were measured with the JAVA image analysis program from Jandel Scientific (San Rafael, CA, USA). To assess the extent of transection of the CC during surgery, brains of B6D2F 2 mice in both the surgery and sham surgery groups were sectioned coronally at 60 μm throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the CC, and every fourth section was stained with gold chloride.…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic group (B6D2F 2 versus RI) was effect coded (+ 1/2, -1/2), whereas CC area was centered by taking the difference from the overall group mean CC size [4]. The third term in the regression equation was the interaction coded as the product of group and centered CC area.…”
Section: Running Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%