Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Circuit neuroscience commonly seeks to assign specific functions to specific circuits. Yet, redundancy can be highly adaptive and is therefore a critical motif in circuit organization. The NAc, a highly integrative brain region controlling motivated behavior, is thought to receive distinct information from its various glutamatergic inputs yet strong evidence of functional specialization of inputs is lacking. Using dual-site fiber photometry in an operant reward task, we simultaneously recorded from two NAc glutamatergic afferents to assess circuit specialization. We identify a common neural motif that integrates reward history in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral hippocampus (vHip) inputs to NAc. Then, by systematically dissociating reward from choice and action, we identify key circuit-specificity in the behavioral conditions that recruit encoding. While mPFC-NAc invariantly encodes reward, vHip-NAc encoding requires goal-directed action and uncertainty. Ultimately, using optogenetic stimulation we demonstrate that both inputs co-operatively modulate task engagement. Taken together, we illustrate how similar encoding, with differential gating by behavioral state, supports outcome encoding to tune engagement to recent history of reward.
Circuit neuroscience commonly seeks to assign specific functions to specific circuits. Yet, redundancy can be highly adaptive and is therefore a critical motif in circuit organization. The NAc, a highly integrative brain region controlling motivated behavior, is thought to receive distinct information from its various glutamatergic inputs yet strong evidence of functional specialization of inputs is lacking. Using dual-site fiber photometry in an operant reward task, we simultaneously recorded from two NAc glutamatergic afferents to assess circuit specialization. We identify a common neural motif that integrates reward history in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral hippocampus (vHip) inputs to NAc. Then, by systematically dissociating reward from choice and action, we identify key circuit-specificity in the behavioral conditions that recruit encoding. While mPFC-NAc invariantly encodes reward, vHip-NAc encoding requires goal-directed action and uncertainty. Ultimately, using optogenetic stimulation we demonstrate that both inputs co-operatively modulate task engagement. Taken together, we illustrate how similar encoding, with differential gating by behavioral state, supports outcome encoding to tune engagement to recent history of reward.
BackgroundAccumulating observational studies have suggested associations between imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) and common neurodegenerative disorders, especially Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The goal of this study is to evaluate the causal associations between structural and functional IDPs and 4 neurodegenerative disorders, including AD, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsBidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) studies were conducted using summary statistics obtained from genome-wide association studies of 3909 IDPs from UK biobank and 4 neurodegenerative disorders.ResultsForward MR analysis showed that volume of cerebral white matter in the left hemisphere was associated with increased risk of ALS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.22,P= 3.52 x 10-6). In reverse MR analysis, we revealed genetically determined risk of AD and MS were associated with multiple IDPs (allP< 1.28 x 10-5[0.05/3909], 9 IDPs in AD and 4 IDPs in MS). For example, genetically determined risk of AD was causally associated with reduced volume of gray matter in right ventral striatum (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.97,P= 4.68 x 10-7) and lower rfMRI amplitudes in several nodes (ICA25 node 9, ICA25 node 8, and ICA100 node 11). Additionally, genetically determined risk of MS was causally associated with reduced volume in left putamen (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97-0.98,P= 4.47 x 10-7) and increased orientation dispersion index in right hippocampus (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04,P= 2.02 x 10-6).ConclusionsOur study suggested plausible causal associations between risk of NDDs and brain IDPs. These findings might hold promise for identifying new disease mechanisms and developing novel preventative therapies for NDDs at the brain imaging levels.
Studying prey capture behavior in mice offers a fruitful platform for understanding how ecologically relevant visual stimuli are differentially processed by the brain throughout life. For example, specific visual stimuli that indicate prey and that naturally draw appetitive orienting in the adult may be interpreted differently or evoke distinct behaviors during development. What are the neural mechanisms that might allow an animal to flexibly couple the same stimulus information to distinct behavioral outcomes as a function of developmental needs? To begin to address this important question, we quantified visually evoked orienting behaviors between adolescent and adult C57BL6/J mice of both sexes under the natural prey capture context compared to responses in our established virtual motion stimulus paradigm, C-SPOT. Most surprisingly, we discovered that female versus male adolescent mice have opposing innate behavioral biases evoked by the same sweeping motion stimuli which is not present in adulthood. Further, female mice display a robust enhancement of approach towards visual motion over all other groups tested, yet, they are the least aggressive in response to live prey. Thus, our work overall revealed that innate approach towards visual motion is robustly dissociated from predatory aggression in female versus male mice specifically during adolescence. This underscores the different natural behavioral goals and physiological states that uniquely apply to female versus male adolescent animals, and, reveals that approach towards visual motion is a key sensory-motor process selectively augmented during female adolescence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.