2009
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination by ultrasound: ethical challenges of sex ratio imbalances and invidious discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() in the USA. While the use of ultrasound to determine foetal sex is particularly contentious in communities with a strong cultural preference for boys (Chervenak and McCullough ), in other societies, expressed sex preference is low and yet the desire to find out foetal sex is common (Chigbu et al . ).…”
Section: Reasons For Booking a Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() in the USA. While the use of ultrasound to determine foetal sex is particularly contentious in communities with a strong cultural preference for boys (Chervenak and McCullough ), in other societies, expressed sex preference is low and yet the desire to find out foetal sex is common (Chigbu et al . ).…”
Section: Reasons For Booking a Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The far-reaching changes initiated by ultrasound in the depiction of real-time, highresolution images, without risks of radiation to the fetus, has led to the ingenuity to assign gender to these children, thereby relieving the apprehension of the pregnant women. However, this has been largely achieved at an opportunity-cost, with consequent emergent moral, 1 medico-legal, ethical, and psycho-social problems, thus prompting several international organizations such as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as well as the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM),to view the request by these women for gender disclosure during prenatal ultrasonography as not only ethically unjustifiable but purely based on the non-medical use [2][3][4] of ultrasound. But, strictly speaking, it is difficult to defend nondisclosure since no scientific evidence of any serious harm to the human fetus has been reported in the over forty years of substantial use of prenatal medically 4 indicated and superintended diagnostic ultrasound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%