“…The far-reaching changes initiated by ultrasound in the depiction of real-time, highresolution images, without risks of radiation to the fetus, has led to the ingenuity to assign gender to these children, thereby relieving the apprehension of the pregnant women. However, this has been largely achieved at an opportunity-cost, with consequent emergent moral, 1 medico-legal, ethical, and psycho-social problems, thus prompting several international organizations such as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as well as the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM),to view the request by these women for gender disclosure during prenatal ultrasonography as not only ethically unjustifiable but purely based on the non-medical use [2][3][4] of ultrasound. But, strictly speaking, it is difficult to defend nondisclosure since no scientific evidence of any serious harm to the human fetus has been reported in the over forty years of substantial use of prenatal medically 4 indicated and superintended diagnostic ultrasound.…”