2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination of human crania using Mastoid triangle and Opisthion–Bimastoid triangle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dong et al [7] found that with the measurements obtained from CT images of the mandible, the sex determination rate was 84.2%. Jain et al [12] showed that from the measurements of mastoid triangle and opisthion-bimastoid triangle, asterion-mastoidale length has an 80% and mastoid breadth has a 75% determination rate. In the study of Akhlaghi et al [1], where they reviewed the frontal sinus parameters from paranasal sinus CT images, they found that the left frontal sinus maximum height has a 61.3% determination rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al [7] found that with the measurements obtained from CT images of the mandible, the sex determination rate was 84.2%. Jain et al [12] showed that from the measurements of mastoid triangle and opisthion-bimastoid triangle, asterion-mastoidale length has an 80% and mastoid breadth has a 75% determination rate. In the study of Akhlaghi et al [1], where they reviewed the frontal sinus parameters from paranasal sinus CT images, they found that the left frontal sinus maximum height has a 61.3% determination rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several measurements of the skull such as the length, height, and circumference of the head, mastoid process, occipital condyle, and foramen magnum (FM) have been used for this analysis in previous studies (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The FM is a three-dimensional aperture within the basal central region of the occipital bone (11) and also is a transition zone between the spine and skull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to replicate the initial successful results could be related to the position of asterion, one of the landmarks employed, which is highly variable among populations and individuals (Day and Tschabitscher, 1998;Sripairojkul and Adultrakoon, 2000;Mwachaka et al, 2010). Methodological differences related to instrumentation are another potential source of error (Kemkes and Gobel, 2006;Saini et al, 2012;Deepali et al, 2013;Jain et al, 2013;Jaja et al, 2013), as the original work was based on xerography (de Paiva and Segre, 2003) and did not address the possibility of variation related to positioning of the skull on the copying device (e.g., different distances between the copy machine and the mastoid; Stephan, 2014).…”
Section: Metric Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%