2015
DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.154595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination using maxillary sinus

Abstract: Background:Individual identification is a subtle concept and often one of the most important priorities in mass disasters, road accidents, air crashes, fires, and even in the investigation of criminal cases. Matching specific features detected on the cadaver with data recorded during the life of an individual is an important aspect in forensics, and can be performed by fingerprint analysis, deoxyribonucleic acid matching, anthropological methods, radiological methods and other techniques which can facilitate a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
62
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The correct predictive accuracy was found to be 70.8% in males and 62.5% in females [3]. Kanthem et al (2015) found that the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinuses of right and left side using computed tomography were markedly larger in males compared with females [1]. All the results of the aforementioned studies were nearly analogous to the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correct predictive accuracy was found to be 70.8% in males and 62.5% in females [3]. Kanthem et al (2015) found that the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinuses of right and left side using computed tomography were markedly larger in males compared with females [1]. All the results of the aforementioned studies were nearly analogous to the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The precision rate is 98% in cases of pelvis and cranium, 95% in pelvis and long bones, and 80–90% only with long bones [3, 5]. Gender can be determined by various methodologies such as sexual dimorphism with tooth morphology, pulpal DNA analysis, study of lip prints, palatal rugae, and finger prints and even with radiological techniques by morphometric analysis of paranasal sinuses [1]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, males showed statistically significant higher mean sinus volumes than females in both the right and left sides. These results were in line with Kanthem et al (34) who found that the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinuses were notably larger in males compared with females. They documented statistically significant values with a higher rate of sexual dimorphism in volume with 85.46% for the right side and 78.38% for the left side.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a study done by Kanthem et al [12] the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinuses of right and left side were much larger in males than in females. Sexual dimorphism according to volume was estimated at 85.46% for right side and 78.38% for left side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%