2017
DOI: 10.1177/0306624x17740555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Difference in Homicide: Comparing Male and Female Violent Crimes in Korea

Abstract: The comparison of the South Korean male and female homicide offenders' characteristics and crime scene behaviours is presented in this study. A total of 537 cases of homicide offenders prosecuted in Korea between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed in terms of offenders' characteristics, victim-offender interaction, places of crime, and crime scene actions. Significant differences between male and female offenders were revealed in prior criminal history, offenders' personal characteristics, choice of victim, crime sce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
37
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
11
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the socio-demographic characteristics of the perpetrators, the results indicate that there is a greater probability that the perpetrator will be female when the victim is a minor and when suffocation methods are used to commit the homicide. Similarly, prior studies have shown that females are more associated with intra-family homicides and suffocation methods, with the victims being mainly minors (filicide) [27,28,31]. Likewise, in accordance with previous works, the results indicate that men are more likely to use firearms and their own body strength to kill their victims [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of the socio-demographic characteristics of the perpetrators, the results indicate that there is a greater probability that the perpetrator will be female when the victim is a minor and when suffocation methods are used to commit the homicide. Similarly, prior studies have shown that females are more associated with intra-family homicides and suffocation methods, with the victims being mainly minors (filicide) [27,28,31]. Likewise, in accordance with previous works, the results indicate that men are more likely to use firearms and their own body strength to kill their victims [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some authors have focused on analyzing the differences in modus operandi according to the perpetrator’s gender. For example, Sea, Youngs, and Tkazky [27] found that men are more likely to kill women and people that they know, whereas women are more likely to kill individuals from the family environment. Similarly, Häkkänen-Nyholm et al [28] revealed the trend to use firearms by men, unlike women who tend to use suffocation methods on their victims, who are from the family environment and usually minors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the SCAS includes diverse sources and files, such as criminal index files, investigative items (e.g., witness reports; medical, criminal, school, and military records), crime scene investigation files (e.g., crime scene pictures), and forensic psychological evaluation reports of the offender (e.g., Personality Assessment Inventory and Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised (). According to previous studies, the interclass correlation between two independent raters (ICC (1,2) ) on SCAS questionnaires among criminal profilers ranges from 0.75 to 0.78 (see refs for ICCs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, there has been an interest in examining the utility of criminal profiling, as a criminal investigation technique directed at assisting in the prioritization and detention of offenders ( Chan et al, 2019 ; Pecino-Latorre et al, 2019a ; Sorochinski and Salfati, 2019 ; Ivaskevics and Almond, 2020 ). Therefore, numerous typologies have been created for homicides, always based on empirical evidence to ensure a more rigorous and systematic profile creation process ( Horning et al, 2015 ; Fujita et al, 2016 ; Khoshnood and Väfors Fritz, 2017 ; Sea et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%