2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Counting and Timing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the potential developmental effects, performance on the peak interval task is likely modulated by hormonal effects. Ovarian hormones are known to affect interval timing (Ross and Santi, 2000 ; Morofushi et al, 2001 ; Sandstrom, 2007 ; Pleil et al, 2011 ; Williams, 2012 ) such that intact females at different stages of their cycle may perform notably differently. This may account for the lack of a significant relationship between peak interval timing and our delay discounting score in females—as can be seen in Figure 5 where females show a wider range of imprecision in timing than males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the potential developmental effects, performance on the peak interval task is likely modulated by hormonal effects. Ovarian hormones are known to affect interval timing (Ross and Santi, 2000 ; Morofushi et al, 2001 ; Sandstrom, 2007 ; Pleil et al, 2011 ; Williams, 2012 ) such that intact females at different stages of their cycle may perform notably differently. This may account for the lack of a significant relationship between peak interval timing and our delay discounting score in females—as can be seen in Figure 5 where females show a wider range of imprecision in timing than males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Williams (2012) suggested that sex differences in timing might be due to the effects of circulating estrogen in adult females versus testosterone in adult males. Besides that, gonadal hormones had been found to influence sexual motivation ( Wallen, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval timing and numerical abilities identified in nonhuman animals, human infants, and children may represent biological and developmental precursors of adults' highly developed computational abilities (Buhusi and Cordes, 2011 ; Lustig, 2011 ; Williams, 2011 ). For instance, at the perceptual level, non-humans and infants appear capable of making magnitude estimates of duration, numerosity and area (i.e., that a given stimulus is presented for “more” time than another, or contains “more” elements—this basic ability is the focus of our review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the atypical development of NEUTIN has the potential to developmentally tease apart the aforementioned accounts, but also to improve understanding of these disorders and their therapeutic and educational remediation. With the exception of Williams and Down syndrome (which have a genetic basis), the disorders included in this review are characterized on the basis of observable behavioral (rather than biomedical) features, and as such, it is useful to know the extent of sensitivity and adaption to time, numerosity and space in these populations—as these types of impairments might contribute to clinical symptoms (and have a “knock-on” effect in development; see also Williams, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%