2009
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00109808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in emphysema phenotype in smokers without airflow obstruction

Abstract: Data on sex differences in emphysema are limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We aimed to verify whether such differences also exist in smokers without airflow obstruction, weighting their influence on the relationship between emphysema and clinical features.We evaluated both clinical and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data of 1,011 heavy smokers recruited by a lung cancer screening project. MDCT scans were analysed with software allowing lobar quantification of emphysema features. For t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results may not be extrapolated directly to females because it is known that males have more CT-quantified emphysema [17] and that sex is independently associated with upper or lower lung-predominant emphysema patterns [28]. Future studies should also include females to examine the association of emphysema distribution and lung function decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results may not be extrapolated directly to females because it is known that males have more CT-quantified emphysema [17] and that sex is independently associated with upper or lower lung-predominant emphysema patterns [28]. Future studies should also include females to examine the association of emphysema distribution and lung function decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure settings were 30 mA?s at 120 peak kilovoltage (kVp) or 140 kVp, depending on the participant's weight (f80 and .80 kg, respectively). This lowdose CT protocol has previously been used to quantify emphysema in COPD patients and heavy smokers [6,[16][17][18]. The vast majority of subjects was scanned on the Brilliance 16P scanner and a very small fraction (,1%) on the Mx8000 IDT scanner, which was used a back-up scanner.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 444 (35.9%) subjects were randomly selected by the computer and mixed up with the other 256 for review. Such cases had been included in another study addressing a separate hypothesis [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure settings were 30 mAs at 120 kVp or 140 kVp, depending on the participant's weight. This low-dose CT protocol has previously been used to quantify emphysema in COPD patients and heavy smokers [16,17]. All CT scans were automatically analysed by software developed in-house [18].…”
Section: Ct Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%