2010
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity of a mechanism that controls body size: implications for sexual size dimorphism

Abstract: The degree and/or direction of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) varies considerably among species and among populations within species. Although this variation is in part genetically based, much of it is probably due to the sexes exhibiting differences in body size plasticity. Here, we use the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta, to test the hypothesis that moths reared on different diet qualities and at different temperatures will exhibit sex-specific body size plasticity. In addition, we explore the proximate mechanisms tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test for effects of phenotypic manipulation while avoiding effects of different innate preferences, we only used individuals that belonged to a single, brown colour morph in the current experiments. Similarly, we used only females to avoid variation due to behavioural and physiological differences between the sexes (Forsman et al 2002;Stillwell and Davidowitz 2010).…”
Section: Study Species and Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for effects of phenotypic manipulation while avoiding effects of different innate preferences, we only used individuals that belonged to a single, brown colour morph in the current experiments. Similarly, we used only females to avoid variation due to behavioural and physiological differences between the sexes (Forsman et al 2002;Stillwell and Davidowitz 2010).…”
Section: Study Species and Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism stems mainly from sex-specific selection pressure that can differ among populations. However, sex-specific differences in phenotypic plasticity are also partially responsible for such variation [27], [28]. Unfortunately, little is known about how sexual size dimorphism varies throughout ontogeny (but see [29], [30]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than being a nuisance factor that obscures underlying patterns of SSD, sex‐specific growth plasticity can be interpreted as an adaptation in its own right (Stillwell & Davidowitz ; Ceballos & Valenzuela ; Ceballos, Hernández & Valenzuela ; Bonneaud et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for both hypotheses has come from studies on several taxa, mainly invertebrates (Stillwell & Davidowitz ; Bonneaud et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%