2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in responses of the basolateral-central amygdala circuit to alcohol, corticosterone and their interaction

Abstract: Alcohol use disorders are chronically relapsing conditions that pose significant health challenges for our society. Stress is a prevalent trigger of relapse, particularly for women, yet the mechanisms by which alcohol and stress interact, and how this differs between males and females, remain poorly understood. The glutamatergic circuit connecting the basolateral (BLA) and central (CeA) nuclei of the amygdala is a likely locus for such adaptations, yet the impact of alcohol, corticosterone and their interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite formidable evidence that women are more sensitive to stress, alcohol and their interaction (Logrip et al 2017), the neural mechanisms underlying sex-specific regulation of alcohol use have been poorly understood. The present findings help fill this gap by demonstrating sexually dimorphic neuropeptide regulation of EtOH sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite formidable evidence that women are more sensitive to stress, alcohol and their interaction (Logrip et al 2017), the neural mechanisms underlying sex-specific regulation of alcohol use have been poorly understood. The present findings help fill this gap by demonstrating sexually dimorphic neuropeptide regulation of EtOH sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) in each neuron using paired stimuli at 50 and 100 ms inter-stimulus interval (Andreasen and Hablitz, 1994; Logrip M., 2017; Roberto et al, 2004b). PPF was calculated as the amplitude of the second EPSP over that of the first EPSP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the ratio is a measure of probability of release for stimulated neurons, such that PPR values above 1 indicate a relative low probability of release, whereas PPR below 1 indicates a relative high probability of release. Additionally, a drug‐induced change in PPR reflects presynaptic effects such that an increase in PPR suggests a decrease in neurotransmitter (GABA) release (Andreasen and Hablitz, ; Kirson et al, ; Logrip et al, ; Manabe et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stimulus strengths were maintained throughout the duration of the experiment. We examined paired‐pulse ratio (PPR), whereby 2 stimuli of the same intensity are applied at varied interstimulus intervals (ISI; Andreasen and Hablitz, ; Kirson et al, ; Logrip et al, ; Manabe et al, ). PPR is calculated as the amplitude of the second eIPSP over that of the first eIPSP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%