2018
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1673-18.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Risk and Resilience: Stress Effects on the Neural Substrates of Emotion and Motivation

Abstract: Risk for stress-sensitive psychopathologies differs in men and women, yet little is known about sex-dependent effects of stress on cellular structure and function in corticolimbic regions implicated in these disorders. Determining how stress influences these regions in males and females will deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying sex-biased psychopathology. Here, we discuss sex differences in CRF regulation of arousal and cognition, glucocorticoid modulation of amygdalar physiology and alcohol c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pretreatment with diazepam prior to repeated stress exposure may alter glutamate dynamics and E/I balance in the PFC, preventing the PFC from adapting its response to multiple stressors, according to a study in male rats (Bagley and Moghaddam, 1997). The male PFC may be better able to adapt to the effects of repeated stress exposure compared to the female PFC (Moench and Wellman, 2017;Wellman et al, 2018;Moench et al, 2019). Plasticity of the PFC following stress is important for resilience and recovery, and chronic stress may impair prefrontal plasticity especially in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Pretreatment with diazepam prior to repeated stress exposure may alter glutamate dynamics and E/I balance in the PFC, preventing the PFC from adapting its response to multiple stressors, according to a study in male rats (Bagley and Moghaddam, 1997). The male PFC may be better able to adapt to the effects of repeated stress exposure compared to the female PFC (Moench and Wellman, 2017;Wellman et al, 2018;Moench et al, 2019). Plasticity of the PFC following stress is important for resilience and recovery, and chronic stress may impair prefrontal plasticity especially in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, females may be more susceptible to a "second hit" of a novel stressor: while prior chronic stress exposure blunts novel acute stress-induced neuronal activation in males, females may have a more exaggerated response to subsequent stressors. Therefore, dendritic retraction may be an adaptive, protective mechanism against initial stress exposure that males employ but females do not, rendering females more susceptible to chronic stress and emotional dysfunction (Moench and Wellman, 2017;Wellman et al, 2018). Supporting the hypothesis that females are more susceptible to a "second hit" of stress, chronically stressed female rats given a rest period show enhanced activity in limbic brain regions following a novel acute stressor compared to their unstressed counterparts.…”
Section: Prefrontal E/i Balance In Emotional Disorders and Chronic Stmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dysfunction of the PFC has been implicated in the pathophysiology of stress‐linked disorders (e.g., Merriam, Thase, Haas, Keshavan, & Sweeney, ; Milad et al, ; Rajkowska, O'Dwyer, Teleki, Stockmeier, & Miguel‐Hidalgo, ). PFC modulates several processes, including executive function and emotion regulation, that are impaired in many stress‐sensitive disorders (Wellman et al, ). In addition, the PFC, along with other corticolimbic brain regions, helps to coordinate the body's physiological response to stress through feedback to the HPA axis (Diorio, Viau, & Meaney, ; McKlveen, Myers, & Herman, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%