1999
DOI: 10.1177/204748739900600205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Survival Rates after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 29Comparability of adjusted results is difficult because of the great heterogeneity in methodology, either in study design, inclusion criteria of the patients or in controlling for confounding factors 29 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 29Comparability of adjusted results is difficult because of the great heterogeneity in methodology, either in study design, inclusion criteria of the patients or in controlling for confounding factors 29 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHD mortality has declined in most developed countries over recent years, with greater declines for men than women (Peltonen, Lundberg, Huhtasaari & Asplund, 2000). Women have poorer prognosis than men following acute myocardial infarction, after adjusting for clinical covariates (Marrugat, Gil & Sala, 1999). These studies suggest a need for research on health care received by women first presenting with CHD symptoms.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Inequalities In Chdmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several studies have addressed the issue of gender differences in the outcome of cardiovascular diseases (1)(2)(3). Few studies have dealt with gender differences and arrhythmias (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%