1929
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1929.sp002611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the cholesterol content of tissues1

Abstract: IT has been known for a considerable time that variations in blood cholesterol occur during pregnancy, and it was not entirely unexpected therefore when the sex differences in the cholesterol content of tissues to be described here were demonstrated. These sex differences were discovered during the examination of a large number of normal rabbits (8), when it was desired to have estimations of the cholesterol content of various tissues for purposes of control.Before including both sexes in the series of control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant difference when a similar comparison was made on the vitamin A-deficient animals. These findings confirm those of Okey, Gillum & Yokela (1934) and Gillum & Okey (1936b); moreover, like these two groups of workers and like Chamberlain (1929), we found that when the liver cholesterol was expressed as mg./g. moist liver the mean figure for the control male rats was higher than the mean for the control females, but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, there was no significant difference when a similar comparison was made on the vitamin A-deficient animals. These findings confirm those of Okey, Gillum & Yokela (1934) and Gillum & Okey (1936b); moreover, like these two groups of workers and like Chamberlain (1929), we found that when the liver cholesterol was expressed as mg./g. moist liver the mean figure for the control male rats was higher than the mean for the control females, but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%