2007
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins after myocardial infarction

Abstract: Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins after myocardial infarctionBackground: We sought to investigate the sex differences in the effectiveness of statins in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, note that the male patient's optimal LR thresholds are never higher than those of the female patient, and the deviation between their optimal LR thresholds are more significant at younger ages. These results are consistent with a recent epidemiological study that has shown that relative cardiovascular risk reduction by treatment is lower for female patients than it is for male patients (Karp et al, 2007). Moreover, they also confirm a meta-analysis of clinical trials for lipid-lowering treatment agents which has demonstrated lesser benefit of treatment for female patients than for male patients (Walsh and Pignone 2004).…”
Section: Numerical Studysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, note that the male patient's optimal LR thresholds are never higher than those of the female patient, and the deviation between their optimal LR thresholds are more significant at younger ages. These results are consistent with a recent epidemiological study that has shown that relative cardiovascular risk reduction by treatment is lower for female patients than it is for male patients (Karp et al, 2007). Moreover, they also confirm a meta-analysis of clinical trials for lipid-lowering treatment agents which has demonstrated lesser benefit of treatment for female patients than for male patients (Walsh and Pignone 2004).…”
Section: Numerical Studysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They calculated outcomes classifying the ambiguous cases in 3different ways: as missing values, as cardiac deaths, and as noncardiac deaths. 32 The results using all 3methods wereequivalent.…”
Section: Study Overview: #6mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This infarct size limiting effect of statins is abrogated by concomitant administration of aspirin [268]. Additionally, statins improve longterm survival, cardiac-related and all-cause mortality rates in these patients [269]. A smaller degree of risk reduction has been reported for women compared with men [269].…”
Section: F) Statins and Cardiac Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%