2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the impact of acute stroke treatment in a population-based study: a sex-specific propensity score approach

Abstract: Purpose We investigated whether sex modifies the association of acute stroke treatment on functional outcome using propensity score (PS) methods to minimize confounding and to explore the differential effects of confounders by sex. Methods We included tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treated (n = 84) and nontreated ischemic stroke cases (n = 143) from a population-based stroke study (2008–2013). The PS model that estimated the probability of receiving tPA included interactions between sex and treatment pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with much of the previous literature, suggesting that certain bio-psycho-social factors that affect the subacute phase have an important influence on functional recovery. [31][32][33] It is possible that older age in women with stroke, emotional impact, greater depression, the degree of social and family support, or even access to rehabilitation therapies, may explain these differences in long-term evolution. These aspects need to be thoroughly investigated to plan interventions aimed at minimizing gender differences in stroke recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with much of the previous literature, suggesting that certain bio-psycho-social factors that affect the subacute phase have an important influence on functional recovery. [31][32][33] It is possible that older age in women with stroke, emotional impact, greater depression, the degree of social and family support, or even access to rehabilitation therapies, may explain these differences in long-term evolution. These aspects need to be thoroughly investigated to plan interventions aimed at minimizing gender differences in stroke recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, there was no difference between ratios of males and females who had favorable outcome at one week following thrombolysis treatment (NIHSS diff.≥ 6; 56.5% in men versus 43.5% in women; p=0.61). In a pooled analysis of three major randomized clinical trials of IV r-tPA, Kent et al showed that the proportion of males and females with good functional outcomes at 90 days following treatment was similar, whereas among the placebo group, significantly fewer women had good outcomes (15).…”
Section: -4: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%