2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the neurobiology of drug addiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
151
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
11
151
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Males failed pre-screening more than females: the majority of candidates who failed due to substance dependence were male (88%), similar to rates reported elsewhere (12). Of note, most substance-dependent males (84%) were cocaine-dependent concurrent with marijuana-dependence, in contrast to other studies in the general population, which described up to 23% of concomitant dependence to both substances (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Males failed pre-screening more than females: the majority of candidates who failed due to substance dependence were male (88%), similar to rates reported elsewhere (12). Of note, most substance-dependent males (84%) were cocaine-dependent concurrent with marijuana-dependence, in contrast to other studies in the general population, which described up to 23% of concomitant dependence to both substances (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Studying all prevalent PPR users cross-sectionally, Becker et al, (2008) and Novak et al, (2009) As for female-male differences, there is a relatively limited epidemiology trace of published estimates (e.g, Bobzean et al, 2014;Chen and Kandel, 2002;Kasperski et al, 2011;Sartor et al, 2014). Overall, for cocaine, these investigations suggest that women, in the past, have been less likely to become newly incident cocaine users, and that there has been no pronounced female-male difference in the probability of transitioning from initial cocaine use into the clinically significant state of cocaine dependence (e.g., see Wagner and Anthony, 2007).…”
Section: How Well Do Our Hill Equation Parameter Estimates For Newly mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a small but growing area. Numerous genes including cytochrome 2A6, which degrades nicotine, genes related to dopamine function (especially monoamine oxidase which is X-linked), as well as opiate GABA and glutamate receptors are involved (Ahijevych, 1999; Becker & Hu, 2008; Bobzean, DeNobrega, & Perrotti, 2014; Enoch, 2003; Enoch & Goldman, 2001; Kreek et al, 2012; Nielsen & Kreek, 2012; Reed, Butelman, Yuferov, Randesi, & Kreek, 2014; Satarug, Tassaneeyakul, Na-Bangchang, Cashman, & Moore, 2006; Seeman, 2009; Tsankova, Renthal, Kumar, & Nestler, 2007). As our understanding of how these genetic influences contribute to the emergence of sex differences in substance use and abuse is marginal, we will not consider this important topic further.…”
Section: Sex/gender Differences In the Neurobiology Of Addictionmentioning
confidence: 99%