2014
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in the Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Population-Based Study

Abstract: Background: This study was performed to assess the influence of sex on drug therapy and long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of ACS patients who underwent PCI [women (n = 8,884) and men (n = 23,937)] between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, with at least a 1-year follow-up, based on the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Propensity score was used to identify a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient clinical status was assessed by the Multisource Comorbidity Score (MCS) [19], a comorbidity index that has been shown to predict mortality and other clinical outcomes in the Italian population better than other commonly used comorbidity scores. Four comorbidity profile categories were established: good (MCS: 0-4), intermediate (5)(6)(7)(8)(9), poor (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and very poor (≥15).…”
Section: Cohort Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patient clinical status was assessed by the Multisource Comorbidity Score (MCS) [19], a comorbidity index that has been shown to predict mortality and other clinical outcomes in the Italian population better than other commonly used comorbidity scores. Four comorbidity profile categories were established: good (MCS: 0-4), intermediate (5)(6)(7)(8)(9), poor (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and very poor (≥15).…”
Section: Cohort Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have investigated differences in the out-of-hospital management of ACS between men and women, and those that have evaluated drug treatment and long-term prognosis observed conflicting findings [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, differences in insurance type seem to cause disparities in the outcome of patients with ACS [ 20 24 ]. However, there remains a lack of available evidence regarding sex-based differences in this context [ 25 ]. To our knowledge, such study to examine post-NHI implementation’s outcome in patients with ACS has never been done in Indonesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although young women had less obstructive CHD, survival was worse compared with similarly aged men. Lin et al 14 carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCI (8884 women and 23 937 men) and found that male sex was associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization for revascularization than female sex. Some studies evaluated PCI procedure success in women compared with men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%