2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in tolerance to the locomotor depressant effects of lobeline in periadolescent rats

Abstract: Lobeline is being tested in clinical trials as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine abuse and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Preclinical research demonstrates that lobeline produces locomotor hypoactivity apart from its therapeutic effects; however, the hypothesis that there are sex differences in hypoactivity or in the development of tolerance to its locomotor depressant effects has not been investigated. Periadolescent rats were injected with saline to determine baseline locomotor activity. Anima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(149 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in activity observed following lobeline (3 mg/kg) in control rats is consistent with previous reports (Damaj et al, 1997; Miller et al, 2003; Harrod and Van Horn, 2009). Tolerance developed to the hypoactivity upon repeated lobeline administration (Miller et al, 2003; Harrod and Van Horn, 2009). Therefore, while lobeline specifically attenuates neonatal ethanol-induced hyperactivity, specificity occurred only across a narrow dose range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decrease in activity observed following lobeline (3 mg/kg) in control rats is consistent with previous reports (Damaj et al, 1997; Miller et al, 2003; Harrod and Van Horn, 2009). Tolerance developed to the hypoactivity upon repeated lobeline administration (Miller et al, 2003; Harrod and Van Horn, 2009). Therefore, while lobeline specifically attenuates neonatal ethanol-induced hyperactivity, specificity occurred only across a narrow dose range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The defining characteristic of Pavlovian learning is that the conditional stimulus (CS) elicits a conditional response from the animal when the stimulus is presented alone, in the absence of the unconditional stimulus (US) [68]. The form of the CR may be the same or the opposite of the unconditional response (UR) produced by the drug [38,47,69]. In the present experiment, exposure to the locomotor activity chambers (i.e., the CS) elicited increased activity and center distance travelled (CR) in the absence of METH (i.e., the US).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done so that the onset of nicotine’s effects did not overlap with the period that rats showed the most exploratory behavior in the chamber, which was during the first 15 min. Previous research indicates that control rats exhibit asymptotic levels of within-session habituation by 20 to 30 min, according to similar procedures and use of the same automated chambers (Harrod et al, 2008; Harrod and Van Horn, 2009). Rats were administered nicotine or saline subcutaneously every day for a total of 20 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%