2021
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in verbal working memory: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: The present meta-analysis aimed to quantify sex differences in verbal working memory and to examine potential moderators of these differences. We examined 802 effect sizes from 478 samples in 284 studies in a multilevel meta-analysis. Results revealed a small overall female advantage (g = .028, 95% CI [.006, .050]). In the overall sample, results showed that sex differences differed across tasks. Specifically, the female advantage was significant for cued tasks (g = .079, 95% CI [.030, .128]) and Free Recall t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one could argue that 30 seconds of distractor activity does not provide a stringent test of the influence of production on retrieval from LTM. In effect, the duration for which the information can be maintained in short-term or working memory is controversial (Cowan, 2017a;Voyer, Saint-Aubin, Altman, & Gallant, 2021) and some theorists suggest that some portion of working memory may remain active for up to a minute (see Cowan, 2017b, for a review). The duration of the retention interval was less of a concern in Experiment 2 in which PRODUCTION EFFECT AND SERIAL POSITIONS 25 long lists were used, but as mentioned above, some of those effects could have been clouded by floor level performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one could argue that 30 seconds of distractor activity does not provide a stringent test of the influence of production on retrieval from LTM. In effect, the duration for which the information can be maintained in short-term or working memory is controversial (Cowan, 2017a;Voyer, Saint-Aubin, Altman, & Gallant, 2021) and some theorists suggest that some portion of working memory may remain active for up to a minute (see Cowan, 2017b, for a review). The duration of the retention interval was less of a concern in Experiment 2 in which PRODUCTION EFFECT AND SERIAL POSITIONS 25 long lists were used, but as mentioned above, some of those effects could have been clouded by floor level performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hippocampal system and memory measures consistently show sex differences in NT samples, and there is some evidence for sex by diagnosis interactions in ASD (Braden, Dassel, et al, 2017; Braden, Smith, et al, 2017; Voyer et al, 2021). In middle‐age adults 40–64 years, we previously found smaller bilateral hippocampal volumes in autistic men, compared with a matched NT men (Braden, Dassel, et al, 2017, Braden, Smith, et al, 2017) but no difference was detected by Koolschijn and Geurts (2016) with a mixed sex sample ranging from 30 to 75 years old.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature suggests being choked/strangled, both in cases of IPV and as a partnered sexual behavior, is highly gendered, with significantly more women being choked/strangled as compared to men (McClane et al, 2001 ; Herbenick et al, 2021e ). Additionally, sex differences have been reported in working memory behavioral performance (Voyer et al, 2017 , 2021 ) and fMRI activation during working memory tasks (Bell et al, 2006 ; Zilles et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%