2021
DOI: 10.3390/life11030266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences on Mitotane Concentration and Treatment Outcome in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Abstract: (1) Background: In clinical settings, data regarding sex are rarely investigated. In women, factors such as body size and composition, hormonal variations, metabolism, and access to care systems and therapy could strongly influence the pharmacological management and the outcome of the therapy. To underline this sex-related difference, we retrospectively collected data from adrenocortical carcinoma patients treated with mitotane, and then evaluated sex-related pharmacokinetics parameters. (2) Methods: A fully v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 39 In addition, a recent publication underlined that mitotane concentrations are strongly affected by gender as female patients treated with adjuvant mitotane showed significantly lower levels (7.6 mg/L versus 11.0 mg/L, p = 0.007) but were also more likely to experience toxic concentrations (8% versus 5%), which should be considered in the dosing process. 40 As current recommendations for adjuvant therapy are not fully satisfactory, assessment of potential biomarkers is of interest. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition related genes FSCN1 and FOXM1 were both strong independent negative prognostic factors if overexpressed in localized or advanced ACC and were suggested to be used as predictive tools.…”
Section: Adjuvant Therapy Of Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 39 In addition, a recent publication underlined that mitotane concentrations are strongly affected by gender as female patients treated with adjuvant mitotane showed significantly lower levels (7.6 mg/L versus 11.0 mg/L, p = 0.007) but were also more likely to experience toxic concentrations (8% versus 5%), which should be considered in the dosing process. 40 As current recommendations for adjuvant therapy are not fully satisfactory, assessment of potential biomarkers is of interest. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition related genes FSCN1 and FOXM1 were both strong independent negative prognostic factors if overexpressed in localized or advanced ACC and were suggested to be used as predictive tools.…”
Section: Adjuvant Therapy Of Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the o,p′-DDD and o,p′-DDE levels were lower in females (F) than males (M) (o,p′-DDD; F/M; 7.6/11.0 µg/ml and o,p′-DDE; F/M; 0.37/0.82 µg/ml). Accordingly, it was also observed that fewer female patients reached and maintained the mitotane level in therapeutic range [ 64 ].…”
Section: Mitotanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, no association of weight or BMI with the blood mitotane concentration was found in the present real-world study. Although two studies found that sex can significantly influence the achievement of the therapeutic concentration of mitotane ( 19 , 35 ), the results of both are controversial. One found that fewer female patients than males were able to achieve and maintain the therapeutic range of 14–20 μg/ml, suggesting that females may be a risk factor for mitotane treatment failure, which presumably stems from effects of sex hormones on drug absorption ( 19 ), whereas another study showed that male patients required higher doses of mitotane than female patients to reach the mitotane therapeutic window ( 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas other studies have shown that the level of mitotane has a poor correlation with administration dosage indicates that there are other factors that may affect the target concentrations of mitotane ( 17 , 18 ). In addition, sex differences in mitotane concentration are still controversial ( 15 , 19 ), and the unexplained pharmacokinetic variability of mitotane remains high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%