2021
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00275-21
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Disparities and Neutralizing-Antibody Durability to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Convalescent Individuals

Abstract: In this study, we found that neutralizing antibody responses in COVID-19-convalescent individuals vary in magnitude but are durable and correlate well with receptor binding domain (RBD) Ig binding antibody levels compared to other SARS-CoV-2 antigen responses. In our cohort, higher neutralizing antibody titers are independently and significantly associated with male sex compared to female sex.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
50
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our 8-month follow-up, we also reported that 76% of the patients still had detectable Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) (1). Many studies reported short-term follow-up observations of less than 6 months (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), whereas others reported longitudinal observations, typically spanning less than 12 months post symptom onset (1,4,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Some studies reported contraction of anti-COVID humoral responses with a stronger initial decline (1,4,(23)(24)(25)27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our 8-month follow-up, we also reported that 76% of the patients still had detectable Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) (1). Many studies reported short-term follow-up observations of less than 6 months (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), whereas others reported longitudinal observations, typically spanning less than 12 months post symptom onset (1,4,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Some studies reported contraction of anti-COVID humoral responses with a stronger initial decline (1,4,(23)(24)(25)27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…An important aspect of monitoring humoral responses has been having access to plasma from the same patients over 14 months. Most reports were based on cross-sectional analysis spanning less than 6 months (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) or up to 12 months (1,4,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Depending on the patient cohort, several studies reported a stronger initial contraction (1,4,(23)(24)(25)27) of anti-COVID humoral responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay was shown to be 95.2% sensitive and 96.7% specific for detecting antibodies among individuals experiencing symptomatic infection at nine days since symptoms onset. 13 The spike RBD-based assay does not cross-react with common human endemic coronaviruses, and the magnitude of RDB antibody levels correlate with neutralizing antibody titers, currently the best correlate of protection against infection. In brief, ELISA plates (Greiner Bio-One #655061) were coated with 4µg/ml of the RBD antigen.…”
Section: Specimen Collection and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A serum was considered seropositive if the absorbance of positive/negative ratio was ≥2.57, to ensure 99.5% specificity per CDC guidelines. 13,14…”
Section: Specimen Collection and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation